Understanding Republican China

I’ve been reading Frank Dikötter’s excellent The Age of Openness, a short introduction to the history of the pre-1949 republican period in Chinese history. I strongly recommend it. Dikötter’s central argument is that after centuries of relative isolation, post-Qing China was tremendously receptive to ideas and institutions drawn from the West. He also argues that our understanding of that era has been dominated by self-serving myths about “warlordism,” a pejorative term that reduces lively debates about provincial autonomy and liberalism to polemical abstractions invented by communist ideologues. There was civil strife during the republican period, including a sharp conflict between north and south. While the number of dead was appallingly large – Dikötter cites Thomas Rawski’s cumulative total of 400,000 —  it was a far cry from the tens of millions who died during the imperial rebellions of the mid-nineteenth century. 

Before the 1937 Sino-Japanese War, the famines and dislocations that occurred were, as Amartya Sen might argue, mitigated by an active free press and representative institutions that, while far from perfect, were far ahead of any other country outside of Europe and North America. Moreover, the economy and calorie consumption grew steadily throughout the republican period. These advances were reversed by the massive economic and nutritional setback of the Second World War and the long Maoist era that only ended in 1978.

China’s administrative state also improved dramatically during the republican years, thanks in part to the diffusion of knowledge from agencies largely staffed by European civil servants. Rightly seen as a blow to Chinese sovereignty, these agencies eventually trained a large cadre of Chinese personnel in the art of managing a modern state.

Perhaps the most impressive strides were intellectual and economic. Dikötter is too careful a historian to draw any sweeping conclusions, so I’ll do it for him: China’s experience during the first era of globalization demonstrates the extent to which the rise of the CCP represented a devastating blow to human progress. The fact that the CCP loosened its grip in the last decades of the 20th century doesn’t change the fact that it has caused more death and destruction than almost any other modern political movement. Incredibly, our understanding of republican China has nevertheless been largely shaped by the CCP and its admirers.   

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular


The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More

Billy Graham: Neither Prophet nor Theologian

Asked in 1972 if he believed in miracles, Billy Graham answered: Yes, Jesus performed some and there are many "miracles around us today, including television and airplanes." Graham was no theologian. Neither was he a prophet. Jesus said "a prophet hath no honor in his own country." Prophets take adversarial ... Read More
Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More