The Visible and the Invisible Effects of Immigration Policy

Ramesh Ponnuru raises an important question: in their recent op-ed weighing in on the immigration debate, Sheldon Adelson, Warren Buffett and Bill Gates devote far more attention to increasing high-skilled immigration, comparatively little to legalizing unauthorized immigrants, and none to increasing low-skilled immigration. This clearly suggests that the three billionaires, like many policymakers, believe that while the case for increasing low-skilled immigration is not entirely clear-cut, the case for increasing high-skilled immigration is quite strong. So why can’t Congress move ahead with a bill focused solely on increasing high-skilled immigration? 

[T]he reason nothing like that has happened is that advocates of “comprehensive immigration reform” have insisted on holding the issue of high-skilled immigration hostage to the resolution of other issues, such as legalization and the creation of a guest-worker program.

That strategy makes a certain kind of sense. Advocates of comprehensive reform know that if a high-skill bill passes, the coalition for their broader proposal loses a lot of support from, well, the likes of Adelson, Buffett and Gates. (And by “support” I mean campaign contributions and ads.) But the strategy works only if the hostages go along, and never demand that stand-alone vote or even acknowledge the truth of their situation.

One of the reasons the hostages go along, however, is that while a high-skilled-only bill would have the backing of the financial services and technology sectors, it would do little for agribusiness and hospitality and tourism, thus shrinking the coalition in favor. Democrats would tend to oppose the bill, as they are heavily invested in the idea of legalizing the unauthorized population, and they recognize that separating the high-skilled component from the rest will greatly weaken the political impetus to do so. This is why I suspect that the most realistic settlement consistent with the goal of limiting future low-skilled immigration as the labor market prospects of low-skilled workers continues to deteriorate would involve some form of legalization, such as Peter Skerry’s notion of normalization without citizenship.

A Reason-Rupe survey conducted last winter found that while Democrats and Republicans have broadly similar views about high-skilled and low-skilled legal immigration (large pluralities in favor of the status quo among Democrats and Republicans, with somewhat more support for increasing the caps than for decreasing them), Democrats are far more likely to support legalization for the unauthorized than Republicans. This could derive from the fact that, as the work of social psychologist Jonathan Haidt suggests, liberal voters tend to be more motivated by sympathy for the visible victims of misfortune while conservative voters tend to place a higher emphasis on proportionality, or procedural fairness. While the media outlets often tell emotionally moving stories about unauthorized immigrants threatened with deportation, it doesn’t tell such stories about, say, hard-working high-skilled foreigners who are eager to settle in the United States, yet who choose not to violate the law to do so. The harm to immigrants in the first category is more palpable than the harm to those in the latter category, yet individuals in the latter category are respecting the letter of America’s difficult-to-navigate immigration laws. 

The child-migrant crisis has elicited broadly parallel reactions. Among liberals, there is shock and horror at the harrowing circumstances in El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras that children are fleeing. Yet there is disinterest, and even disbelief, at the notion that that U.S. immigration policy has played a role in the destructive drama unfolding in Central America and along the border. As often happens, the focus is on the immediate humanitarian challenge rather than other questions, e.g., whether welcoming an influx of child migrants might encourage others to leave their families behind, often with the aid of violent gangs. that, as David Frum warns, will be enriched and strengthened in the process. 

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More
Elections

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More
U.S.

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More