What’s the Matter with Hoboken?

Josh Barro of Business Insider addresses Hoboken Mayor Dawn Zimmer’s new allegations against members of the Christie administration. According to Zimmer, Lt. Gov. Kim Guadagno threatened to withhold post-Sandy assistance if she didn’t play ball with a zoning change that would benefit an influential real estate developer, the Rockefeller Group. Basically, Barro explains that the modest amount that Hoboken has received under the state’s Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) makes sense when viewed in the context of the amount of money that has been disbursed so far, the share of grant funds that were available to local governments in the first place, and the grant applications for which Hoboken has been eligible so far. And though Barro acknowledges the possibility that the HMGP was structured in a way that cuts against the interests of a dense urban jurisdiction like Hoboken, that can hardly be characterized as the product of political retribution against Zimmer, as there are many other dense urban jurisdictions that have been disadvantaged in the same way. Barro does, however, criticize Team Christie’s PR strategy of focusing on funds that have been disbursed to Hoboken through programs other than HMGP, as the Christie administration has limited leverage over these other funds. 

On a related note, Nikolai Fedak defends the Rockefeller Group’s multi-use real estate development that is at issue, and he states that Zimmer has adopted an anti-development posture that is harming Hoboken’s long-term interests. Zimmer is, of course, entitled to have unwise public policy preferences. But I can’t help but think that while threatening to withhold post-Sandy assistance as part of a quid pro quo would obviously be inappropriate, it seems perfectly reasonable for Christie administration officials to stress the importance of strengthening Hoboken’s, and New Jersey’s, tax base. 

And in light of the shenanigans at the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Stephen Smith of The Next City calls for its abolition.

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular


The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More