Will Congress Really Cut Medicare?

Ezra Klein interviews Jim Horney of the liberal Center on Budget and Policy Priorities on the key question about health reform. I’m skeptical, but Horney is clearly well-informed. My central objection is this:

I think people are contradicting themselves when they say the deficit reduction in here isn’t big enough, and it won’t stick because Congress won’t do it. But they also just haven‘t looked at the record. When there’s been political will, and there has been in the past, Congress has done significant deficit reduction. 

I actually think that Horney is right: there have been moments of fiscal sanity. The issue, however, is whether the health reform package really reflects a turn towards spending discipline. The model I find plausible is that the political will for deficit reduction is tied to a willingness to endure economic restraint across the board. Spending cuts and tax increases tend to go together, as in the early 1990s, and tax cuts and spending increases tend to go together, as we saw during the 2000s. It should go without saying that all conservatives want both spending cuts and tax cuts, but historically these things don’t go together, at least in the modern American context. William Niskanen of Cato made this argument in 2006, and it strikes me as basically sound. That’s why I think doing the hard work of slashing spending should be central focus of conservatives, not slashing taxes while leaving spending intact. 

If this health reform package were, as Douglas Holtz-Eakin recommended, built solely on entitlement and delivery system reform, it would reflect a very different gestalt, and it might have attracted bipartisan support as a response to a bona fide economic and fiscal crisis. Of course, Democrats and Republicans have no confidence in the willingness of the other party to adhere to hard spending limits, which is why it occasionally feels as though our country is at risk of becoming a banana republic.   

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More