Would you live in the Nineties for a million dollars?

 

The question is not entirely ironic.

Like most of you, I thoroughly enjoyed this video, in which The Fund for American Studies asks passersby, “Would you give up the internet for a million dollars?” The (mostly younger) respondents are certain they would not — even for much higher sums.

The takeaway is that in the internet, as professor Michael Cox says, “What the market has done is created a tremendous gap between worth — how much you pay for it — and cost.” I agree with Cox and Tyler Cowen that this is a very important truth. The web has allowed us to make an enormous leap in the last decade in well-being that isn’t reflected in GDP.

But that gain is certainly not worth a million dollars per person. And so this video should not serve as much consolation for our failure to significantly raise wages or enjoy 1960s-levels GDP growth for the past four decades. There’s a basic problem in the question’s frame.

As is, it’s analogous to asking “Would you give up your ability to speak English for a million dollars?” I certainly wouldn’t. But that’s not because it is so much more mellifluous and logical than French that life in English is at least a million dollars better. It’s just that English happens to be the hegemonic language right now, so my ability to get on in life and interact with others is dependent upon my facility with it.

Same with the internet. The FAS’s question biases each respondent to imagine what his life in today’s world would look like without the internet. And that is pretty grim. Since so many of our interactions, party invitations, apartment- and job-findings, conversations, etc., are mediated over the internet, any one person who gave up the web would miss out on a lot. But that’s just because the internet moved these goods and services online, not because it created or necessarily improved them.

The more interesting question would be “Would you live in the Nineties for a million dollars?” And that’s an obvious yes. Allowing a few weeks for desensitization to acid-wash jeans and leviathan lapels, the prospects of economic security (until it’s time to send the kids to Harvard) and travel to posh locales, would more than outweigh the inability to reach one’s co-workers on the weekend. Even ten percent of a million likely would.

Is life today better for the median-wage earner, despite stagnating wages, thanks to the internet? Probably. Should we be as optimistic about it as the video proposes? I doubt it. 

Most Popular

U.S.

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Science & Tech

Set NASA Free

The Trump administration has proposed shifting the International Space Station from a NASA-exclusive research facility to a semi-public, semi-private one. Its plan would nix all government funding for the ISS by 2025 and award at least $150 million per year to NASA to help with the transition. This would be a ... Read More