Just to Clarify, Among Democrats, The Phrase “War on Terror” Is Not Okay, But “Tyranny of Oil” Is Okie-Dokie

I had been going back and forth on whether to address John Edwards’ refusal to use the phrase “global war on terror.” After all, more than a few people on the right have said for a long time that they didn’t like the term because of its unspecificity; they preferred a “war on Islamist extremism” or “war on Islamofascism” or something a bit clearer on naming the enemy. “War on al-Qaeda” would seem to be too narrow, since a non-al-Qaeda group of terrorists could be equally eager to kill Americans.

Anyway, Edwards laid out his thinking to Time:

And now, in his first interview to explain his turnabout, Edwards tells TIME that he will no longer use what he views as “a Bush-created political phrase.”
“This political language has created a frame that is not accurate and that Bush and his gang have used to justify anything they want to do,” Edwards said in a phone interview from Everett, Wash. “It’s been used to justify a whole series of things that are not justifiable, ranging from the war in Iraq, to torture, to violation of the civil liberties of Americans, to illegal spying on Americans. Anyone who speaks out against these things is treated as unpatriotic. I also think it suggests that there’s a fixed enemy that we can defeat with just a military campaign. I just don’t think that’s true.”

But Hillary Spot reader T. brought this to my attention, and I concur — if “war on terror” is unacceptable, then what about phrases like the “tyranny of oil“? (When asked during the debate, Barack Obama did raise his hand to say he believed in a “global war on terror.”)
How’s that for an “inaccurate frame”? (Man, I look forward to the day that our friends on the left stop seeing a George Lakoff linguistic conspiracy everywhere they look.) How will phrases like “tyranny of oil” be used to justify a whole series of things that are not justifiable?
For that matter, doesn’t the phrase “tyranny of oil” suggest that “there’s a fixed enemy that we can defeat with just a military campaign”?

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More