A Republican Strategist Evaluates The Democrats’ Debate Performance

Talked to a Republican strategist who watched the debate. His assessment:

If it had been a radio debate, I think Chris Dodd would have won. He seemed to have the most substantive answers that fit the time available…
I was underwhelmed by Obama. He didn’t live up to the hype or his public image…
Hillary didn’t accomplish what she needed to do tonight, which is persuade people she’s a likeable person. She still has time to do that, but she didn’t make much progress tonight…
Gravel should not have been invited. He didn’t treat his colleagues with respect…
Edwards botched the moral leader question. I counted five solid seconds of silence. I don’t know how you do that, how you can be that unprepared for a debate as a presidential candidate. Pretty uncomfortable. I know it was only five seconds, but it felt like a minute…
I think Biden did a very good job. To be perfectly honest, when he talks about foreign policy, and talks with some level of economy, he sounds more wise than other Democrats running. He won the three second clip on the nightly news by prudently saying “yes” to avoid gaffes. He made me chuckle, and I don’t really like him…
Kucinich is probably wasting people’s time, but I hear he does fill moderately sized room in New Hampshire, so there are Democrats out there who want to hear his message. If he’s still on stage several months from now, they may need to recalibrate.
On that last exchange, I don’t think Obama should have engaged those two guys. It made him seem smaller. [Gravel and Kucinich] are the first two people you’re gonna draw a red line through. He’s sitting here engaging on whether he’s gonna nuke Iran with two nutty guys. His handlers were probably thinking, ‘just end it, just end it, disengage!’

This strategist noted, and I concurred, that even though Brian Williams only offered the question about a hypothetical terrorist attack on two American cities to one or two candidates, all of them came back to it and emphasized their willingness to use military force to defend America. The strategist wondered if they were inadvertently confirming Rudy’s charge, by feeling the need to emphasize that they’re a bunch of dovish wimps. I wonder if every candidate had “look strong on terrorism” on their mental to-do lists, and felt the need to make sure they checked that box before the night was through.

Most Popular


The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More

Billy Graham: Neither Prophet nor Theologian

Asked in 1972 if he believed in miracles, Billy Graham answered: Yes, Jesus performed some and there are many "miracles around us today, including television and airplanes." Graham was no theologian. Neither was he a prophet. Jesus said "a prophet hath no honor in his own country." Prophets take adversarial ... Read More
Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More