Rick Warren Was All It Took to Turn Gay Liberals Against Obama?

So Barack Obama selected Rick Warren to give the invocation at his inauguration, and around the righty blogosphere, there is a lot of chuckling over the reaction of gays and liberals* — a furious, incredulous sputtering and livid response.

I find myself strangely not joining in the laughter. I’m reading the volcanic reactions on some of these sites, and I feel a smidgen of sympathy, or maybe a bit of concern. Not worried about these folks, but for these folks. (Okay, there’s a little of the usual, “Oh, this is the pastor you guys find objectionable? But the guy who said the U.S. bombed Hiroshima on December 7, and that the government created the AIDS virus – he’s small potatoes?”)

I don’t agree with John Aravosis very often, but I enjoy our joint appearances on CNN, etc., and I’m kind of shocked to see that picking Warren was enough get him joking (at least, I think he’s joking) about throwing shoes at the president-elect.

Maybe this is a reflection of a disappointing second term for President Bush, but I’m more or less used to politicians disappointing me. The Right pushed hard to reelect the guy in 2004 because they didn’t want an economic liberal, and four years later we’re hearing, “I have abandoned free-market principles in order to save the free-market system.” Henry Paulson was supposed to be the most savvy treasury secretary in ages; now he seems to be making up the plan as he goes along.  Two disastrous cycles for the GOP in Congress, and they keep the same leadership in both chambers. John McCain took only a few weeks to start complaining about unfair tactics from the RNC again. Every politician fails to live up to expectations in one form or another — even Reagan gave conservatives only one-and-a-half good Supreme Court justices out of three opportunities.

But reading the comments on these liberal blogs . . . these folks sound like they’re experiencing an unparalleled betrayal . . . over the invocation at the inauguration. Much as we may disagree, I can’t take much pleasure in these folks’ agony, even if it’s self-inflicted by putting their faith in a man who kept insisting that he opposed gay marriage and has demonstrated a striking capacity to throw the politically inconvenient “under the bus.”

Putting faith in politicians is not a formula for fulfillment or a sense of satisfaction in life. You find much more of that outside of the political world.

*UPDATE: Brendan objects with the class and reserve I’ve come to expect from our friends on the other side of the aisle. I can see how someone might interpret the link as labeling him as gay in the sentence above, and I regret any erroroneous insinuation. He also declares that he is a “leftist,” not a “liberal.”

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More