The Corner

A $100 Drop in a $20,000 Bucket

The centerpiece of President Obama’s new middle-class economics is a plan to raise taxes on high-income households and big banks by $320 billion over the next decade to finance a slew of new middle-class tax breaks and spending programs. We can debate the merits of each discrete proposal. Many of us, including Andrew P. Kelly of AEI, have already discussed why his new community college initiative is a step in the wrong direction. Yet not all of Obama proposals are wrongheaded. For example, his proposed bank tax, which bears a resemblance to a levy that Dave Camp, former chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, included in his 2014 tax reform, could do some good, particularly if it were slightly tweaked. Of course, the agenda the president is largely symbolic. In The Week, James Pethokoukis reminds us that the White House could finance all of its new spending, direct and indirect, by adding 2 percent to debt accumulation over the next decade. That’s not nothing, but it’s not a crippling burden. By swapping tax hikes on the rich for spending on the middle class, Obama is putting a marker down: redistribution is his top priority, and he intends to tout its virtues for the rest of his presidency – and presumably for many more years after that. But how much is this latest round of redistribution likely to achieve?  

Consider a new column from Eugene Steuerle of the Urban Institute, a straight-shooting centrist who has a knack for demystifying complex policy questions. To put the new Obama plan in context, Steuerle observes that federal, state, and local governments already spend, both directly and on various tax subsidies, over $20,000 per person per year, an amount that is set to soar as the economy grows and as baby boomers retire. Essentially, the president is calling for increasing this amount by a bit more than $100. Now, it may well be true that an extra $100 per person per year is all that stands between us and middle-class nirvana. But do you really think anyone in the White House believes that to be true? Ron Haskins of the Brookings Institution has been praising the White House for investing more resources in evidence-based policy, and he documents that the vast majority of social expenditures are devoted to programs that haven’t really been rigorously evaluated. Could it really be that we can’t find $100 in that $20,000 or so that we already spend that can’t be better directed? I’d love to hear Obama explain why not. 

Reihan Salam — Reihan Salam is executive editor of National Review and a National Review Institute policy fellow.

Most Popular


Holy Week with Saint Paul

Just the other day, I ordered a replacement copy of The Passion of the Christ -- it can be so impactful for Holy Week meditation. In the years since its release, it’s become something of required Lenten viewing for me. But this year, there is a new movie to help with prayer, Paul, Apostle of Christ, released ... Read More

Friday Links

UPS Trucks (Mostly) Don't Turn Left, Saving Them 10 Million Gallons of Gas Per Year. Scientists provide comprehensive breakdown of how much people poo in their lifetime. Famed archaeologist forged murals, inscriptions for decades. How Do You Make Beer in Space? Astronauts return to earth ... Read More

Heckuva Job, Paul and Mitch

As Thursday's editorial makes clear, the omnibus spending bill is a disgrace. That may be why about 40 percent of Republicans (and 40 percent of Democrats) voted against it. Apart from the absence of a DACA/Dream amnesty, the immigration portions represent a comprehensive victory by the anti-enforcement crowd. ... Read More
Politics & Policy

California’s Pro-Nuclear Renegade

If California’s upcoming gubernatorial race gets decided solely by money, Michael Shellenberger doesn’t have a chance. The latest campaign filings show that Shellenberger, an environmentalist from Berkeley, has about $37,000 in cash on hand. The frontrunner in the June 5 California primary, Lieutenant ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Sliming of Bari Weiss

If you follow at all the ideological war that’s erupted around the New York Times editorial page, then you know Bari Weiss. It’s too much to call Bari conservative. A better description might be heterodox. On some issues, particularly social issues and immigration, she’s a woman of the Left. On others — ... Read More