The Corner

Culture

‘Contempt’? Hardly

In the New York Times, Michelle Goldberg criticizes David French:

“Under the bill’s actual text, virtually any claim of impairment would suffice to meet the act’s requirements,” wrote National Review’s David French. “Anxiety? Depression? The conventional physical challenges of postpartum recovery? Any of those things could justify taking the life of a fully formed, completely viable, living infant.”

French appears to be worried that women will seek, and doctors will perform, late-term abortions for trivial reasons. But there’s contempt for women embedded in the idea that, absent legal prohibition, someone on the verge of giving birth might instead terminate her pregnancy to avoid the brutalities of labor.

Let’s leave aside for a moment that the strongly pro-choice, Planned Parenthood-founded Guttmacher Institute confirms that “most women seeking later terminations are not doing so for reasons of fetal anomaly or life endangerment,” and focus instead on Goldberg’s peculiar claim that “there’s contempt for women embedded in the idea that, absent legal prohibition, someone on the verge of giving birth might instead terminate her pregnancy to avoid the brutalities of labor.”

Contempt? If that’s true, then every single law we have on the books in the United States is dripping with “contempt” for some group or other. We pass laws because we know that some people — usually, only a few — do, indeed, do bad, dangerous, or damaging things, and because we want to disincentivize them from doing so, and to punish them if we fail. Speed limits, understood within Goldberg’s rubric, are built atop “contempt for the drivers of cars, embedded in the idea that, absent legal prohibition, they might speed.” Tax penalties, by their nature, are the product of “contempt for Americans who, absent legal prohibition, might cheat and lie and refuse to pay for public services.” One can do it with anything. Child-support rules exhibit contempt for men. Desertion regulations are an attack on our brave soldiers. In loco parentis provisions within our age-of-consent laws reflect a devastating lack of trust in teachers. Etc., etc. That some women make bad decisions — in this case, at the cost of the life of another — is categorically true. To acknowledge as much, in the law or otherwise, is not to attack all women. It’s to recognize that in this area, as in others, not every single person who treads our common soil is a saint.

Most Popular

Elections

One Last Grift for Bernie Sanders

Bernie Sanders, the antique Brooklyn socialist who represents Vermont in the Senate, is not quite ready to retire to his lakeside dacha and so once again is running for the presidential nomination of a party to which he does not belong with an agenda about which he cannot be quite entirely ... Read More
PC Culture

Hate-Crime Hoaxes Reflect America’s Sickness

On January 29, tabloid news site TMZ broke the shocking story that Jussie Smollett, a gay black entertainer and progressive activist, had been viciously attacked in Chicago. Two racist white men had fractured his rib, poured bleach on him, and tied a noose around his neck. As they were leaving, they shouted ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Strange Paradoxes of Our Age

Modern prophets often say one thing and do another. Worse, they often advocate in the abstract as a way of justifying their doing the opposite in the concrete. The result is that contemporary culture abounds with the inexplicable — mostly because modern progressivism makes all sorts of race, class, and ... Read More
Film & TV

A Sublime Christian Masterpiece of a Film

‘There are two ways through life -- the way of nature and the way of grace,” remarks the saintly mother at the outset of The Tree of Life, one of the most awe-inspiring films of the 21st century. She continues: Grace doesn’t try please itself. It accepts being slighted, forgotten, disliked, accepts insults ... Read More
U.S.

White Progressives Are Polarizing America

To understand how far left (and how quickly) the Democratic party has moved, let’s cycle back a very short 20 years. If 1998 Bill Clinton ran in the Democratic primary today, he’d be instantaneously labeled a far-right bigot. His support for the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the Defense of Marriage Act, ... Read More