The Corner

Politics & Policy

Abortion: The Later, the Worse?

An email:

You’ve been writing a lot about late-term abortion but here’s the problem: You guys want to ban all abortion. You say that a one-celled zygote has the same rights as a toddler and for that matter as an adult woman. I can respect that point of view (I don’t share it). But if you think abortions in week 8 are just as bad as abortions in week 30, isn’t all the outrage about late-term ones just cynical politics?

Let me argue back at you on two tracks.

First: Let’s say that I took the view that you attribute to me, that abortions early and late in pregnancy are morally equivalent. I don’t think that there would be anything wrong with pointing out to my fellow citizens who see something wrong with eighth-month abortions that current law permits them and that they ought to work with us pro-lifers to protect babies at that age even if we are going to continue to disagree about earlier abortions. That’s part of how democratic politics works: People try to appeal to others who don’t share all of their premises by finding common ground. We might even try to get our fellow citizens to see that what they have supported has led to something they cannot countenance.

Second: I don’t, in fact, view abortions early and late in pregnancy as morally equivalent. I think the latter are worse. That’s not because I doubt that the just-conceived human embryo has the exact same right not to be deliberately killed that the eight-month-old fetus, the toddler, the teenager, and the adult woman all have. (Obviously no one believes that human beings at these different stages of development all have “the same rights” in some more general sense; I don’t think anyone believes the toddler has a right to vote or serve on a jury, although I have not been keeping up with Vox.)

Rather, I think that people have less excuse for misunderstanding the moral status of an eight-month-old human fetus than they do for misunderstanding the moral status of a human embryo (especially in our era). Holding everything else constant, killing the former or supporting the elective killing of the former shows a deeper corruption of conscience than aborting or supporting the elective killing of the latter. Killing infants or supporting infanticide is worse still.

Pro-lifers thus can, and I think should, hold both that abortion early and late should be proscribed and that abortions late in pregnancy should inspire extra revulsion.

Update: Another correspondent e-mails, “I’d add pain capability to the morality question for later term abortions.  It may very well be that less formed babies don’t feel the pain involved with early term abortion.  But there’s little doubt about later term.   So the brutality of the methods required feeds into morality.  I know you know that.” Yes, there are several reasons one might make a moral distinction between early and late abortions, or between abortions and other kinds of killing, that do not require treating human beings at early stages of development as having a lesser right to life than human beings at later stages of development.

Something to Consider

If you enjoyed this article, we have a proposition for you: Join NRPLUS. Members get all of our content (including the magazine), no paywalls or content meters, an advertising-minimal experience, and unique access to our writers and editors (conference calls, social-media groups, etc.). And importantly, NRPLUS members help keep NR going. Consider it?

If you enjoyed this article, and were stimulated by its contents, we have a proposition for you: Join NRPLUS.

LEARN MORE
Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

The March for Life Is a March for Truth

Pro-lifers are marching today, as they do every year, to commemorate a great evil that was done in January 1973 and to express solidarity with its innocent victims. The Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade eliminated legal protections for unborn children in all 50 states, and did so without any ... Read More
Law & the Courts

The March for Life Is a March for Truth

Pro-lifers are marching today, as they do every year, to commemorate a great evil that was done in January 1973 and to express solidarity with its innocent victims. The Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade eliminated legal protections for unborn children in all 50 states, and did so without any ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Clarence Thomas Speaks

Those who know Justice Clarence Thomas say that any perception of him as dour or phlegmatic couldn't be more off-base. He's a charming, gracious, jovial man, full of bonhomie and easy with a laugh, or so I'm told by people who know him well. On summer breaks he likes to roam around the country in an RV and stay ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Clarence Thomas Speaks

Those who know Justice Clarence Thomas say that any perception of him as dour or phlegmatic couldn't be more off-base. He's a charming, gracious, jovial man, full of bonhomie and easy with a laugh, or so I'm told by people who know him well. On summer breaks he likes to roam around the country in an RV and stay ... Read More
U.S.

Nadler’s Folly

Jerry Nadler must have missed the day in law school where they teach you about persuasion. The House Democrat made a critical error early in the trial of President Trump. He didn’t just say that Republican senators, who voted to begin the proceedings without calling witnesses, were part of a cover-up. He said ... Read More
U.S.

Nadler’s Folly

Jerry Nadler must have missed the day in law school where they teach you about persuasion. The House Democrat made a critical error early in the trial of President Trump. He didn’t just say that Republican senators, who voted to begin the proceedings without calling witnesses, were part of a cover-up. He said ... Read More
White House

On the Bidens, Schiff Opened the Door

You opened the door. Trial lawyers live in fear of that phrase. When a trial starts, both sides know what the allegations are. Both have had enough discovery to know what the adversary will try to prove. Just as significantly, both know what their own vulnerabilities are. A litigator spends his pretrial ... Read More
White House

On the Bidens, Schiff Opened the Door

You opened the door. Trial lawyers live in fear of that phrase. When a trial starts, both sides know what the allegations are. Both have had enough discovery to know what the adversary will try to prove. Just as significantly, both know what their own vulnerabilities are. A litigator spends his pretrial ... Read More