The Corner

Law & the Courts

The Left Discovers Democracy

Writing in today’s New York Times, Katha Pollitt advises the pro-choice movement about how to preserve “abortion rights” in the wake of the Supreme Court’s changing complexion. “Tattoo this on your brain,” she writes. “Abortion rights is the majority position.”

That may be true, but if so, what is she so worried about? The majority view will presumably be enshrined in state laws. Oh, the states. The Left has forgotten about them. Pollitt writes: “For some reason, many abortion-rights advocates have had a hard time grasping that the state level is where most abortion restrictions happen.” Well, yes. After 45 years of depending upon the Supreme Court to enact their legislative preferences, the role of democratic government might have escaped their notice. “If Roe is overturned, each state will be free to make its own laws.” You don’t say.

Pollitt hopes to enlist doctors, state legislators and governors, the 24 percent of women who’ve had abortions, and religious people to the cause of abortion rights. Yet her case for the Roe regime is remarkably threadbare. She notes that women have abortions for “good reasons” but doesn’t specify them. According to the Alan Guttmacher Institute, 73 percent of women say they can’t afford a baby right now, and 74 percent say a baby would dramatically change their life. Those may sound like good reasons to abort to Pollitt. Others may find them good reasons to place a baby for adoption.

Abortion has been linked to feminism in our time, but as I outline in my new book, Sex Matters, the early feminists saw it differently. Susan B. Anthony and other suffragettes regarded abortion as a form of male abuse of women. No discussion of abortion is complete without acknowledging that many women are coerced into it by boyfriends or husbands. The Guttmacher Institute reports that 19 percent of women say they were unsure about their relationships, and 20 percent report that they were pressured by their parents or husbands.

“We need to make more allies,” Pollitt pleads. Yes, that’s how it’s supposed to work in a democracy. The pro-choice side has escaped from democratic accountability for decades. Let’s hope we are in for a true debate in which the people decide.

Most Popular


Weirdo O’Rourke

Friends of the young Bill Clinton and Barack Obama spoke of the special glow of promise they had about them, even back in their early twenties. Angels sat on their shoulders. History gave them a wink and said, “Hey, good lookin’, I’ll be back to pick you up later.” Robert O’Rourke? Not so much. He ... Read More

Our Bankrupt Elite

Every element of the college admissions scandal, a.k.a “Operation Varsity Blues,” is fascinating. There are the players: the Yale dad who, implicated in a securities-fraud case, tipped the feds off to the caper; a shady high-school counselor turned admissions consultant; the 36-year-old Harvard grad who ... Read More

McCain at Annapolis

President Trump has been doing a lot of tweeting today -- against TV programs, companies, and other things that have incurred his displeasure. These tweets make for interesting reading. One of them is this: So it was indeed (just proven in court papers) “last in his class” (Annapolis) John McCain that sent ... Read More
Health Care

David Brooks Forgets to Oppose Some Suicides

The well-meaning David Brooks urges us to prevent suicide in his most recent New York Times column. The crisis is certainly real. From "How to Fight Suicide:": You’ve probably seen the recent statistics about the suicide epidemic — that suicide rates over all have risen by over 30 percent this century; ... Read More