The Corner


I’ll share in the skepticism about the Columbia invitation to Ahmadinejad. And I certainly agree that double standards are all too often seen in academia when it comes to deciding who is or who is not to be given a ‘platform’. That said, it’s worth making the more general point that agreeing to debate Ahmadinejad need not in itself necessarily be “appeasement”. On the contrary, played properly, such a debate could be an opportunity to show him up for what he is.

Here, meanwhile, is a reminder of that self-confident time when the US was prepared to debate the bad guys, a link to an article on the Nixon/Khruschev “kitchen debate”. Khruschev, it should be remembered, had, in the past, not only advocated mass murder, but, as one of Stalin’s key aides, had also helped organize it. And was Vice-President Nixon right to debate this butcher? Yes.

Most Popular


The Odds Are Slim to Nunes

When the history of the 2018 midterms is written, there will be a chapter on missed opportunities for Democrats. Some may wonder if they should have spent so much money supporting Beto O’Rourke in Texas, or whether Heidi Heitkamp was doomed from the start in North Dakota. One painful question for progressives ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Beatification of Beto

The media’s treatment of Texas Democratic candidate Beto O’Rourke wasn’t the most egregiously unfair coverage of the past year -- that would be the treatment of Brett Kavanaugh -- but it ranks among 2018’s most annoying. The endless glowing profiles of O’Rourke in every publication from Vanity Fair to ... Read More