The Corner

All Good Things

On Saturday, the USS Enterprise, the first nuclear-powered aircraft carrier and the world’s largest warship, will be retired. After almost exactly 51 years of service, she will be “inactivated,” the stage prior to formal decommissioning, at a ceremony expected to attract 15,000 guests. The great ship is already being stripped of all usable equipment, and will then be cut open to extract the eight nuclear reactors. Contrary to prior reports, Shatner will not be at the ceremony.

Having missed seeing Sinatra or Bill Monroe before their deaths, I was determined to see the Enterprise before she sails to the undiscovered country, from whose bourn no traveller returns. So I drove down to Norfolk this week and toured the ship, sat in the captain’s chair on the bridge (naturally), and spent some time talking with assorted sailors (quite a few of them Star Trek fans). There were lots of Enterprise veterans in town for the ceremony, and a time capsule was set up for them to submit notes or mementos to be presented to the next Enterprise, the ninth in our fleet that would bear that name.

The time capsule added an additional note of melancholy. Because, you see, there may never be another Enterprise. The next carrier under construction is the USS Gerald R. Ford (no disrespect to the man, but don’t get me started on ship names), and it’s scheduled for delivery in 2015. The next one, the USS John F. Kennedy (the second carrier named after him), is supposedly planned for 2020, but may be delayed at least a couple of years. There’s a petition to name the one after that, CVN-80, planned for delivery around 2025, Enterprise.

But with our being the brokest nation in history, that may be a carrier too far. Maybe I’ve been reading too much Roman history, but when I saw the time capsule I kind of felt like a Romano-Briton being told by the departing legions that they’d be right back. I fear that our coming national bankruptcy will lead, not to a much more limited and focused foreign policy backed by an incomparably lethal military, but rather to a weak, distracted force in the service of a weak and distracted foreign policy. The Afghans, Syrians, Burmese, Bosnians, and Malians (!) should be left to work out their own destinies, but as a quasi-island nation, the United States will always need a large and powerful Navy. But as we approach banana republic-dom, I fear we’ve seen the high-water mark of our mastery of the seas.

The Big E

Mark Krikorian — Mark Krikorian, a nationally recognized expert on immigration issues, has served as Executive Director of the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) since 1995.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

‘Judges for the #Resistance’

At Politico, I wrote today about the judiciary’s activism against Trump on immigration: There is a lawlessness rampant in the land, but it isn’t emanating from the Trump administration. The source is the federal judges who are making a mockery of their profession by twisting the law to block the Trump ... Read More
White House

Trump’s Friendships Are America’s Asset

The stale, clichéd conceptions of Donald Trump held by both Left and Right — a man either utterly useless or only rigidly, transactionally tolerable — conceal the fact that the president does possess redeeming talents that are uniquely his, and deserve praise on their own merit. One is personal friendliness ... Read More

Columbia 1968: Another Untold Story

Fifty years ago this week, Columbia students riding the combined wave of the civil-rights and anti-war movements went on strike, occupied buildings across campus, and shut the university down. As you revisit that episode of the larger drama that was the annus horribilis 1968, bear in mind that the past isn’t ... Read More

Only the Strident Survive

‘I am not prone to anxiety,” historian Niall Ferguson wrote in the Times of London on April 22. “Last week, however, for the first time since I went through the emotional trauma of divorce, I experienced an uncontrollable panic attack.” The cause? “A few intemperate emails, inadvertently forwarded ... Read More

Poll Finds Nevada Voters Support School-Choice Programs

According to an April poll, a large number of Nevada voters support school-choice programs. The poll, conducted by Nevada Independent/Mellman, found that 70 percent of voters support a proposal for a special-needs Education Savings Account and 59 percent support expanding the funding for the current tax-credit ... Read More