The Corner

Alternatives to Killing

At yesterday’s hearing on stem cells, some people argued for new lines of research and others condemned the proposed research as immoral–but the sides were the reverse of what we normally see. Some conservatives, notably Stanford professor and bioethics-council member William Hurlbut, have been proposing to try to get stem cells without destroying human embryos. They propose the creation of biological entities that could serve as sources of stem cells but would not be human organisms (because they would lack the capacity to organize themselves and direct their own development). According to Rick Weiss, Democratic Senator Tom Harkin “criticized Hurlbut’s approach as monstrous” in a hearing yesterday. “If it’s not an embryo, what is this Frankenstein-like thing we’re creating?” Harkin asked. “The hypocrisy here is indefensible.”

It’s Harkin’s own inconsistency that seems hard to defend. If Harkin thinks it is fine to create and then kill human embryos for research, how can he object to creating sources of stem cells that aren’t human embryos and wouldn’t have to be killed?

Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

Film & TV

A Film for All Christians

‘The growing good of the world is partly dependent on unhistoric acts,” wrote George Eliot in Middlemarch, “and that things are not so ill with you and me as they might have been, is half owing to the number who lived faithfully a hidden life, and rest in unvisited tombs.” The passage provides the title ... Read More
Film & TV

A Film for All Christians

‘The growing good of the world is partly dependent on unhistoric acts,” wrote George Eliot in Middlemarch, “and that things are not so ill with you and me as they might have been, is half owing to the number who lived faithfully a hidden life, and rest in unvisited tombs.” The passage provides the title ... Read More
Law & the Courts

The FBI’s Corrupt Cops

White-collar criminals should hope for one thing this Christmas: that they get to live under the Horowitz rules. Michael Horowitz has testified that he found no evidence of political bias on the part of the decision makers who, under the Obama administration, relied on hilariously implausible “evidence” ... Read More
Law & the Courts

The FBI’s Corrupt Cops

White-collar criminals should hope for one thing this Christmas: that they get to live under the Horowitz rules. Michael Horowitz has testified that he found no evidence of political bias on the part of the decision makers who, under the Obama administration, relied on hilariously implausible “evidence” ... Read More