The Corner

Amash And Bachmann Butt Heads Over NSA

Representatives Justin Amash and Michele Bachmann butted heads at a meeting of House conservatives held today in conjunction with the Heritage Foundation. The conflict du jour: how to vote on Amash’s proposed amendment that would curtail the powers granted to the NSA in Section 215 of the Patriot Act. The only member of the panel to oppose the amendment — the group included Representatives Raul Labrador, Steve Scalise, Tim Huelskamp, David Schweikert, and other conservatives — was Bachmann, who contended that the amendment isn’t necessary to protect constitutional rights and would harm national security.

“Individuals do not own the records, the records belong to the company,” she said. “The records are in their possession, they belong to the phone companies, they’re not the individual’s. So there’s no Fourth Amendment expectation of privacy or right to the business-record exception.”

She went on to argue that FISA Sec. 702 applies to the collection of intelligence about foreigners on foreign soil, who don’t have constitutional rights.

“If we take this program and remove from the United States the distinct advantage that we have versus any other country,” she argued, ”it will be those who are seeking to achieve the goals of Islamic jihad who will benefit by putting the United States at risk, and it will be the United States which will be at risk.”

“I believe that we need to win the War on Terror,” she continued. “We need to defeat the goals and aims of Islamic jihad, and for that reason I will be voting no on the Amash amendment.”

Amash responded that his amendment doesn’t affect Section 702, explaining that advocates of the NSA’s domestic program often praise the advantages Section 702 provides in fighting terror, despite the fact that his amendment won’t affect it. Section 215, however, allows the widespread collection of Americans’ phone records, he continued, and that’s what his amendment would prevent.

“All you have to do is go home to your constituents and ask them whether they think they have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their phone records or any of their other records that are stored by any third party, and they will tell you yes,” he said.

“Under the legal reasoning that the intelligence community and others in the government are putting forward, none of your records are private, nothing, not even your data,” he continued. If Americans don’t have a reasonable expectation of privacy for information stored by third parties, he contended, then “you might as well throw the Fourth Amendment out the window.”

Bachmann responded that the records belong to the phone companies and other third parties that possess them, but Amash didn’t buy it.

“That’s like saying our e-mails are the property of Google,” responded Amash. “We have a problem if that’s going to be our interpretation of the Fourth Amendment.”

Most Popular


It’s Time for Colin Kaepernick to Move On

Colin Kaepernick. Remember him? Below-average quarterback. Above-average poseur. Not “activist,” not really. Activists actually say stuff. Kaepernick almost never says anything. He’s like the Queen or most popes — you have to read the deep-background musings of supposed members of his inner circle to get ... Read More

What The 1619 Project Leaves Out

“The goal of The 1619 Project, a major initiative from The New York Times that this issue of the magazine inaugurates, is to reframe American history by considering what it would mean to regard 1619 as our nation’s birth year,” The New York Times Magazine editors declare. “Doing so requires us to place ... Read More

Trump and the Black Vote

"Donald Trump is a racist, white supremacist, white nationalist. So are his supporters." Some version of that refrain is heard almost hourly somewhere in mainstream media. Democratic politicians seem to proclaim it more often than that. Listening only to the Left, you'd conclude that more than half a ... Read More
PC Culture

Courage Is the Cure for Political Correctness

This might come as some surprise to observers of our campus culture wars, but there was a time, not long ago, when the situation in American higher education was much worse. There a wave of vicious campus activism aimed at silencing heterodox speakers, and it was typically empowered by a comprehensive regime of ... Read More

The Age of Miscalculation

On August 7, 1998, more than 200 people were killed in terrorist attacks on U.S. embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. Americans learned three names most of them never had heard before: Ayman al-Zawahiri, Osama bin Laden, and al-Qaeda. On August 20, 1998, President Bill Clinton ordered a ... Read More