From a reader:
Here’s my Krugman analogy:
Krugman’s the gambler who keeps doubling down on his bet in the hopes that after losing so many times in a row, he’ll be able to recoup his losses in a single hand. With every new article, Krugman seems to spout some new conspiracy theory or idiotic lefty-cliché that he hopes will stick. He’s hoping that one of his columns will be able to make up for all of the idiotic columns over the past two years. His fans are gambling enablers who continue to feed his addiction by writing him and encouraging him to continue to gamble with his columns.