The Corner

Health Care

Another Way CBO Distorted the Health Debate

Throughout the last decade’s debate over health policy, the Congressional Budget Office had a high degree of faith in the power of fines to get people to buy health insurance. That faith appears now to have been mistaken.

As I wrote earlier in the Corner, though, the CBO’s estimates of the impact of Republican health-care bills were heavily influenced by this exaggerated confidence. Democrats and the media then twisted the CBO’s mistaken estimates, claiming that Republicans would cause 14-22 million Americans to “lose” their health insurance. (Assuming the estimate had been correct, “voluntarily go without” would have been a better description in many cases.)

The CBO had an additional, subtler effect on the debate over repealing and replacing Obamacare. Take away the CBO’s exaggerated faith in the fines and its dubious assumptions about how states would respond to different rules regarding Medicaid, and the Republican bills would still, in all likelihood, have reduced the number of people on the insurance rolls. The bills could have been modified to shrink this effect. But the CBO’s error made Republicans less willing to make that effort.

Any Republican legislation was going to target the fines, which were one of Obamacare’s least popular features. (Republicans managed to abolish the fines while leaving much of Obamacare in place.) The CBO was going to find that almost any legislation that ended the fines caused a major decrease in insurance coverage. Changing other features of the legislation might have improved the real-world impact of it, but was not going to produce a good CBO score for coverage. That helps to explain why Republicans didn’t, for example, spend a little more to get more people covered: It wasn’t going to help any of their bills survive a debate so thoroughly shaped by the CBO.

We would have had a different, and better, debate if the CBO had not adopted a flawed model or if the press had given that model less credence.

Something to Consider

If you enjoyed this article, we have a proposition for you: Join NRPLUS. Members get all of our content (including the magazine), no paywalls or content meters, an advertising-minimal experience, and unique access to our writers and editors (conference calls, social-media groups, etc.). And importantly, NRPLUS members help keep NR going. Consider it?

If you enjoyed this article, and were stimulated by its contents, we have a proposition for you: Join NRPLUS.

Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular


White Cats and Black Swans

Making a film of Cats is a bold endeavor — it is a musical with no real plot, based on T. S. Eliot’s idea of child-appropriate poems, and old Tom was a strange cat indeed. Casting Idris Elba as the criminal cat Macavity seems almost inevitable — he has always made a great gangster — but I think there was ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Other Case against Reparations

Reparations are an ethical disaster. Proceeding from a doctrine of collective guilt, they are the penalty for slavery and Jim Crow, sins of which few living Americans stand accused. An offense against common sense as well as morality, reparations would take from Bubba and give to Barack, never mind if the former ... Read More
Politics & Policy

May I See Your ID?

Identity is big these days, and probably all days: racial identity, ethnic identity, political identity, etc. Tribalism. It seems to be baked into the human cake. Only the consciously, persistently religious, or spiritual, transcend it, I suppose. (“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor ... Read More
Health Care

The Puzzling Problem of Vaping

San Francisco -- A 29-story office building at 123 Mission Street illustrates the policy puzzles that fester because of these facts: For centuries, tobacco has been a widely used, legal consumer good that does serious and often lethal harm when used as it is intended to be used. And its harmfulness has been a ... Read More