The Corner

Immigration

Basket of Deplorables, Trump Administration Edition

White House senior adviser Jared Kushner at a dinner symposium of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) in Washington, D.C., May 2, 2019. (Yuri Gripas/Reuters)

The White House immigration plan, whose development is being overseen by Jared Kushner, is an attempt to show what the administration is for, not just what it’s against. This is a useful exercise, even though there’s zero chance it will be approved by Congress. The goal appears to lay out a roadmap of where Republicans want to go on immigration.

The package isn’t fully cooked yet, but its broad outlines are clear. It won’t try to address everything comprehensively, focusing instead on enforcement and the legal immigration system. It thus isn’t expected to include an amnesty or any changes to the myriad guest-worker programs. Enforcement measures will reportedly address the border crisis (a Flores fix, etc.), as well as mandate use of the E-Verify system to confirm the information collected by an employer when taking on a new hire.

The legal-immigration portion includes the changes the president has long talked about, including a narrowing of the family categories to limit chain migration, an end to the visa lottery, and an overhaul of the skills-based portion of the system to stress merit in the form of educational attainment, and other factors.

While the details, once they’re announced, will matter, this is all generally positive.

But there’s a fundamental problem that suggests the brain trust overseeing this effort is out of touch with the president’s base. The proposal will not include any reduction in the overall level of legal immigration, not even a symbolic one. In other words, all the reductions in green cards from ending the visa lottery and narrowing the family categories would be reallocated to the newly revised merit system. (This is unlike the approach of the Raise Act, which the president has endorsed, which would not shift the green cards from the family categories over to the skilled categories.)

This is especially important because the proposal is not really a legislative vehicle; there’s no chance an immigration bill even remotely acceptable to Republicans can make it through this Congress. That means this proposal is more of a campaign platform, outlining the official Republican approach to immigration. Formally embracing the current legal-immigration level of more than one million each year would mean that the GOP, as on so many issues before, would simply be the Democrat-lite party, wanting to go in the same direction, just more slowly.

You’d think bringing down the annual number of green cards issued from the current 1.1 million to, say, just one million wouldn’t be controversial for an iconoclastic president who’s in the White House mainly because of his hawkishness on immigration. But you’d be wrong.

Ever since this year’s State of the Union address, President Trump has been signaling his desire for an increase in immigration because of the low unemployment rate. This despite explicit commitments to the contrary during the campaign and earlier in his term.

Of course, the idea that we’re running short of potential workers is absurd; as Jason Richwine noted in these pages recently, [w]ith one in nine prime-age males still sitting idle, terms such as full employment’ and labor shortage ring hollow.

So the president is wrong about this, but if he really wants to follow in the footsteps of the Bush and Obama administrations (and the stillborn Jeb and Hillary administrations) and push for increased immigration to please our corporations, he can make his case, gauge the pushback, and decide if he’s willing to pay the political price.

But the tone from unnamed White House sources working on the Kushner plan has recently turned from attempted persuasion of skeptical Trump supporters to Hillary-ish contempt.

To begin with, the authors of the White House plan seem to consider that they’ve already made a grudging but significant concession to the Deplorables simply by not including an increase in immigration, despite the president’s rhetoric.

Then, last week McClatchy quoted a person familiar with the plan as saying that E-Verify was included to calm concerns on the right over the lack of reduction of immigration numbers on the skills side. This is absurd, and contains a whiff of boob bait for Bubba. E-Verify really is vital to any meaningful effort to limit illegal immigration, but why would anyone think it has anything to do with the excessively high level of legal immigration?

And in a Politico story Monday, a senior administration official went full basket-of-deplorables, telling POLITICO that immigration restrictionists are a pretty fringe’ group that have not been an important part of the president’s base. They have bullied a lot of the most rational people out of the conversation.

If Republican voters wanted a White House that thought skeptics of mass immigration are an irrational fringe they would have voted for Jeb! On the other hand, the increasingly contemptuous tone suggests the team assembling the immigration plan are getting pushback for their decision not to include even a token reduction in numbers.

But the plan hasn’t been formally unveiled yet, so there’s still time to repair this mistake. It’s not even particularly difficult, and requires no walk-back by the president. Just reallocate the green cards from the extended-family categories to the new merit system, thus admitting more people than ever before based on their skills, but eliminate the visa lottery and don’t relocate those numbers. It wouldn’t even amount to a 5 percent reduction in legal immigration, but would acknowledge that there are problems caused by mass legal immigration, even in a good economy.

And, now that you mention it, why is the White House even talking about legal immigration when the border is spinning out of control, to the degree that even the New York Times is writing, Congress, Give Trump His Border Money. First things first.

Mark Krikorian, a nationally recognized expert on immigration issues, has served as Executive Director of the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) since 1995.

Most Popular

U.S.

In Defense of Coleman Hughes

Picture the scene: A young man walks into a congressional hearing to offer witness testimony. His grandfather was barbarically brutalized by people who are now long dead. The nation in which he resides built its wealth of his grandfather’s brutalization. The question: Should his fellow citizens pay the young ... Read More
Film & TV

Toy Story 4: A National Anthem

The Toy Story franchise is the closest thing we have to an undisputed national anthem, a popular belief that celebrates what we think we all stand for — cooperation, ingenuity, and simple values, such as perpetual hope. This fact of our infantile, desensitized culture became apparent back in 2010 when I took a ... Read More
Education

College Leaders Should Learn from Oberlin

Thanks to their social-justice warrior mindset, the leaders of Oberlin College have caused an Ohio jury to hit it with $44 million in compensatory and punitive damages in a case where the school couldn't resist the urge to side with its “woke” students against a local business. College leaders should learn ... Read More
Elections

Joe and the Segs

Joe Biden has stepped in it, good and deep. Biden, if he has any hope of ever being elected president, will be dependent on residual goodwill among African Americans from his time as Barack Obama’s loyal and deferential vice president — so deferential, in fact, that he stood aside for Herself in 2016 even ... Read More
Film & TV

Fosse/Verdon and the Dismal #MeToo Obsession

In the final episode of Fosse/Verdon, one of the two titular characters, Bob Fosse, is shooting one of the greatest films of all time. The other, Gwen Verdon, is having a quarrel with her unspeakably dull boyfriend about whether he approves of her performing in a road-show production of a Broadway musical. These ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Madcap Caution of Donald Trump

The worry last week was that the Trump administration was ginning up fake intelligence about Iran blowing up oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz to justify a war against Iran. Then, this week, President Donald Trump said the Iranian attacks weren’t a big deal. The episode is another indication of the ... Read More