The Corner

National Security & Defense

Ben Sasse Raises a Problem with the Iran Deal You May Not Have Known About

If Iran is suspected of not complying with the agreement that the Obama administration is trying to finalize this week in Vienna, should it have to demonstrate in a timely fashion that it is, in fact, following the deal, or should the U.S. have to prove to the parties to the agreement — Russia, China, Germany, France, Britain, and Iran itself — and then the U.N. Security Council that Iran is in fact violating it?

That’s an important question Senator Ben Sasse raises in a letter to President Obama that he released this week. The deal we’re going to get, he worries, will put the burden of proof on the U.S., not Iran.

The theoretical deal is essentially what’s called a “cash for access” agreement, not a mutual arms-control agreement — if Iran starts ramping up its nuclear program (cuts off the access), the only thing the U.S. can do is hold back the rewards that it’s giving Iran (cut off the cash). But if, as now looks likely, the U.S. hands over all the cash immediately, rather than unwinding sanctions over a long period of proven compliance, the only way to punish Iran for violations — without which the deal would just be a handshake – is to reimpose sanctions, ideally as a coalition of nations. (Even if sanctions are phased out, of course, this problem will arise a few years down the road.)

#related#That’s where Sasse’s point comes in: If the reimposition of international sanctions involves making a case for the violations to other world powers, and to the U.N., it’s almost certainly not going to happen, and certainly won’t happen quickly. Remember the U.S. going to the U.N. to make the case that Saddam Hussein was violating U.N. resolutions — should the U.S. really sign a deal where something like that is our only leverage?

Senator Sasse’s whole letter, which touches on other problems with the hypothetical Iran deal as well, is here.

Patrick Brennan — Patrick Brennan is a writer and policy analyst based in Washington, D.C. He was Director of Digital Content for Marco Rubio's presidential campaign, writing op-eds, policy content, and leading the ...

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

The Worst Cover-Up of All Time

President Donald Trump may be guilty of many things, but a cover-up in the Mueller probe isn’t one of them. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, attempting to appease forces in the Democratic party eager for impeachment, is accusing him of one, with all the familiar Watergate connotations. The charge is strange, ... Read More

Theresa May: A Political Obituary

On Friday, Theresa May, perhaps the worst Conservative prime minister in recent history, announced her resignation outside of number 10 Downing Street. She will step down effective June 7. “I have done my best,” she insisted. “I have done everything I can. . . . I believe it was right to persevere even ... Read More
PC Culture

TV Before PC

Affixing one’s glance to the rear-view mirror is usually as ill-advised as staring at one’s own reflection. Still, what a delight it was on Wednesday to see a fresh rendition of “Those Were the Days,” from All in the Family, a show I haven’t watched for nearly 40 years. This time it was Woody Harrelson ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Democrats’ Other Class War

There is a class war going on inside the Democratic party. Consider these two cris de couer: Writing in the New York Times under the headline “America’s Cities Are Unlivable — Blame Wealthy Liberals,” Farhad Manjoo argues that rich progressives have, through their political domination of cities such as ... Read More
White House

For Democrats, the Party’s Over

If the Democrats are really tempted by impeachment, bring it on. Since the day after the 2016 election they have been threatening this, placing their chips on the Russian-collusion fantasy and then on the phantasmagoric charade of obstruction of justice. The attorney general accurately gave the ingredients of the ... Read More