The Corner

Politics & Policy

Critic of Trump’s Education Secretary Proclaims That School Choice ‘Destroys Communities’

The latest attack on Donald Trump’s incoming education secretary Betsy DeVos is coming from academia’s foremost public-school activist, Diane Ravitch, who characterizes DeVos’s reforms as a “hoax.”

In an interview with Chicago’s WBEZ, Ravitch sets out in no uncertain terms her ideological commitment to secular, government-run education. She offers the obligatory attack on DeVos’s past support for vouchers — maintaining a zero-tolerance policy on state programs involving religious schools — but she mainly targets DeVos’s philosophy on education reform.

Ravitch maintains that DeVos’s original sin is her commitment to choice:

The problem with choice is that it destroys communities, and the biggest problem with choice is that it destroys a public institution. [A public school is] a democratic institution under public control and it should be supported by everyone in the community — even those without children or whose children are grown. School choice was the battle cry of Southern segregationists.

Got that? If a family wants the freedom to choose where their child goes to school, they are complicit in “destroying communities,” and got their ideas from southern segregationists. This exemplifies blind faith in government to deliver the best results for everyone, and it provides cover for liberals’ preference for centralization (about which Ravitch has reservations). Republicans ought to continue the move away from Democrats’ Washington-first approach to education, and early signs indicate that is what the Trump administration will do.

Throughout her career, Ravitch has written about the importance of the government guaranteeing civil rights in schools, but now she is working against minority students by painting choice as a driver of inequality. Where they have been effectively administered, school-choice measures have provided the only proven check on the inequality endemic to the old system of district-school monopolies.

Elsewhere, Ravitch expressed opposition to raising the cap on Massachusetts charter schools, and it is tempting to argue that this shows colossal ignorance about the effectiveness of those schools. But her ideology is the most likely cause. Ravitch’s aim is the strength of public schools as an institution (which means administrators and teachers, as well as their unions), and in current reform battles, that position puts her at odds with charter schools, tax credits, and vouchers — even where they produce incredible results for low-income students. Taking this line of thinking leaves students and their best interests behind.

DeVos ought to take the opposite approach and regard student outcomes, not public-school interests, as paramount.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Hillary Ruins the Plan

Editor’s note: Andrew C. McCarthy’s new book is Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency. This is the first in a series of excerpts.  There really was a collusion plot. It really did target our election system. It absolutely sought to usurp our capacity for ... Read More

Another Pop-Culture Christian Loses His Faith

It’s happened again. For the second time in three weeks, a prominent (at least in Evangelical circles) Christian has renounced his faith. In July, it was Josh Harris, a pastor and author of the mega-best-selling purity-culture book I Kissed Dating Goodbye. This month, it’s Hillsong United songwriter and ... Read More

Max Boot’s Dishonesty

Before yesterday, my primary criticism of the Washington Post’s Max Boot was political in nature. As I wrote in a recent book review, I found it regrettable that Boot’s opposition to the president had not prevented him from “succumbing reactively to Trump’s cult of personality, or from making Trump the ... Read More

A Brief History of Election Meddling

Editor’s note: Andrew C. McCarthy’s new book is Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency. This is the second in a series of excerpts. ‘The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back.” Thus spoke President Barack Obama just a couple of weeks before ... Read More

The End of Hong Kong as We Know It

The protests in Hong Kong have been going on for more than four months now, and no matter how the current crisis concludes in the coming days or weeks, it will mark the end of Hong Kong as we know it. The protests started in response to an extradition bill that was proposed by the city’s Beijing-backed ... Read More