The Corner

Biden on Privacy

In The New Republic, Jeffrey Rosen declares that Joe Biden is a great champion for “civil liberties” and “the little guy” (I’ll omit the obvious pro-life riposte). Biden, Rosen says, will help with “the challenging task of reconstructing civil liberties after the assault of the last eight years.” Normally, when people write about the alleged assault on civil liberties, they have in mind the Bush administration’s anti-terror policies. But the bulk of Rosen’s article is given over to celebrating Biden’s role in the rejection of Robert Bork’s nomination to the Supreme Court in 1987.

In that battle, “privacy” meant rights to procure abortion and contraception. A lot of the Democratic rhetoric concerned contraception, since Bork thought that there is no constitutional right to it. But this was always a phony issue. “Biden’s great insight was that Bork misjudged the attitudes of middle-class Americans toward sexual freedom,” writes Rosen. But if the vast majority of Americans supported the legal availability of contraception, as was the case, then why was it important that judges be around to strike down laws restricting it? Such laws were in no danger of passing. In practice, what was really at stake was the nearly-unrestricted right to abortion that the Supreme Court had invented in Roe—a right that Biden, at least at the time, was willing to admit was hard to find in the actual Constitution. So Biden whipped up hysteria about a phony issue in order to defend the indefensible, and now Rosen is congratulating him for it.

Ramesh Ponnuru — Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg View, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

White House

The Problem Isn’t Just the GOP, Mr. Comey

During a CNN town hall on Wednesday night, James Comey alleged that the Republican party allows President Trump to get away with making inappropriate statements without holding him accountable. “If the Republicans, if they just close their eyes and imagine Barack Obama waking up in the morning saying someone ... Read More
Law & the Courts

‘Judges for the #Resistance’

At Politico, I wrote today about the judiciary’s activism against Trump on immigration: There is a lawlessness rampant in the land, but it isn’t emanating from the Trump administration. The source is the federal judges who are making a mockery of their profession by twisting the law to block the Trump ... Read More
White House

Trump’s Friendships Are America’s Asset

The stale, clichéd conceptions of Donald Trump held by both Left and Right — a man either utterly useless or only rigidly, transactionally tolerable — conceal the fact that the president does possess redeeming talents that are uniquely his, and deserve praise on their own merit. One is personal friendliness ... Read More

Columbia 1968: Another Untold Story

Fifty years ago this week, Columbia students riding the combined wave of the civil-rights and anti-war movements went on strike, occupied buildings across campus, and shut the university down. As you revisit that episode of the larger drama that was the annus horribilis 1968, bear in mind that the past isn’t ... Read More

Only the Strident Survive

‘I am not prone to anxiety,” historian Niall Ferguson wrote in the Times of London on April 22. “Last week, however, for the first time since I went through the emotional trauma of divorce, I experienced an uncontrollable panic attack.” The cause? “A few intemperate emails, inadvertently forwarded ... Read More