The Corner

Bioethicists Don’t Let People Vote Trump!

Bioethics may not have started out as a liberal political and social movement, but–like most of the humanities in academia–that is definitely what it has become.

Indeed, unless a “bioethicist” has a modifier like “Catholic” or “conservative” in front of the identifier, you can be almost certain that he or she is a cultural leftist, political progressive, almost surely Democrat (if not Green)–and highly secular.

Thus, mainstream bioethicists all support abortion, embryonic stem cell research, and the memes of “social justice.” Most endorse euthanasia/assisted suicide, single payer healthcare, and the need to expand access to radical reproductive technologies.

The field considers infanticide–sometimes called “after-birth abortion–and killing cognitively disabled patients for organs to be worthy of respectable debate. 

That is why an hysterical article in Bioethics Today by Wayne Shelton–Ph.D., don’t you know–is such a load of sewage.

Shelton apparently sees Trump as an apocalyptic threat to the democratic and moral order. I understand that he’s not alone.

But his argumentation is pure crapola. From, “A Concerning Time for America: No Time to be Politically Silent:”

The goal of ethical resolution in our democratic context is not to arrive at the ultimate, final, or “the” canonical ethical answer, but to reach a consensus between opposing moral perspectives that preserves a plurality of moral values based on well-established moral and legal democratic principles and values.

Thus, bioethics as a field that deals with living, practical ethical conflicts depends on a stable, democratic political system in which people with diverse values and beliefs can find non-violent, indeed peaceful means of finding resolutions to their moral differences. It is in this light that bioethicists should find very concerning what is happening in our presidential election cycle.

If bioethics is so dedicated to “diverse values and beliefs,” where are all the openly pro-life tenured professors teaching in major secular university bioethics centers? (Princeton’s Robby George doesn’t count, as he wasn’t tenured in bioethics.)

Indeed, if respect and engagement with morally diverse perspectives is so central to the field, why do pro-life university students who aspire to engage in the field tell me they feel the need to hide their true beliefs in order not to be discriminated against professionally?

Shelton declares–laughably–that it would be “unconstitutional” to deport 12 million illegal aliens and to bar Muslims from entering the country. (What does that have to do with bioethics?) No, it might be unwise policy, but that isn’t the same thing.

And he gives away the game by essentially acknowledging that his readers will all be of his political ilk:

Another part of the explanation also involves evolving cultural and religious norms over the past few decades governing same sex marriage, women’s roles and their reproductive rights, along with greater ethnic and religious inclusion and tolerance—changes that we liberals celebrate as progress and essential to a growing democracy—that are anathema to many on the political and cultural right.

Bioethicists support the creation of a technocratic society in which they–as the experts–ensure that the great unwashed increasingly lose sway. Thus, it is up to the bioethicists to save the republic!

I conclude that this political season is not a normal cycle in the American democratic experiment. It is not a time for thoughtful people and thought-leaders like bioethicists, to remain silent. We must speak out individually and make ourselves heard.

Pomposity leaders, more like it.

When it comes to bioethics, it is usually wise to follow Seinfield’s old George Costanza rule: Do the opposite of what they advocate as the best way to successfully maintain a moral and truly diverse society.

Most Popular

White House

A Thought on the Trump-DOJ Scandal

We Americans have a habit of putting fundamental social and political questions out of our minds by turning them into technical legal questions. This tendency is one of the forces at work in the increasingly dramatic showdown between the Department of Justice and the President of the United States. There is ... Read More

School Shootings and the Incentives of Violence

Today’s Morning Jolt discusses school shootings and the common difficulties of the teenage years, and I thought of another aspect that I forgot to include -- the degree to which our society, in its reaction to violence, inadvertently rewards that violence. Every teenager wants attention, to be recognized, to ... Read More
NR Marketing

Down the Home Stretch

Our Spring 2018 Webathon winds up this week. El jefe, Mr. Lowry, makes the case, wonderfully, for your participating, even at this final stage. In case you need some visual inspiration, we’ll use this horse race image from the novel Ben Hur (you'll remember the 1959 movie version starred the late NR ... Read More
PC Culture

The Nature of Progressive Insensitivity

Former vice president Joe Biden is back in the news yet again. For a second time, he seems surprised that poor residents of the inner city are capable of doing sophisticated jobs: We don't think ordinary people can do things like program, code. It's not rocket science, guys. So, we went and we hired some folks ... Read More