The Corner

Blaming Newt Gingrich for D.C. Dysfunctionalism?

The Christian Science Monitor does its bit for the MSM narrative that Republicans are the cause of everything evil in Washington, D.C., both in the past and today. In an article on why Congress is so dysfunctional, partisan, and petty, Brad Knickerbocker lays the blame on Newt Gingrich, of course, quoting a former GOP House aide who says

[Things] began to change, political analysts note, when former Rep. Newt Gingrich assumed House leadership in 1995.

“Newt was a ‘take no prisoners’ kind of Speaker,” former GOP congressional staff member John Lawing told Capitol Hill Blue, a non-partisan political web site. “For him everything was personal and partisan.”

That’s funny, I would have thought one could just as easily have traced a poisionous political partisanship to the saintly Democrats’ character assassination of Robert Bork during his 1987 Supreme Court hearings. As reporters without an ideological axe to grind may remember, liberal groups trolled through Bork’s video-store rental records, looking for dirt with which to smear him; television ads portraying him as an extremist ran in major markets; and the Democratic-majority Judiciary Committee staff thoroughly and with complete professional negligence misrepresented his record.

But all that paled in comparison to one of the most dishonest and scurrilous speeches ever delivered on the floor of the U.S. Senate, when Ted Kennedy showed the the moral vaccum of his character by declaiming that 

Robert Bork’s America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens’ doors in midnight raids . . .

Republicans were quite rightly stunned. The finest legal mind in America had been viciously attacked and his personal and professional reputation destroyed by those who saw politics as just another battlefield for power, whatever the cost. To impressionable young Democrats and Republicans alike, the message was clear, all the more so in that the tactic was successful. Back then no one may have heard of Saul Alinsky, but the tactics were the same and have now become the favored weapon of Barack Obama and today’s Democratic party, and used, as well, by Republicans when it suits them. You sow what you reap, and the country has paid a price ever since.

Most Popular

Culture

New England Journal of Medicine Pushes Reparations

Reparations would grant African Americans government benefits not paid to other Americans to rectify the awful sin of slavery and the "peculiar institution's" residual harm. It is a favored policy of hard progressives, so of course, the New England Journal of Medicine -- which regularly promotes left-wing causes ... Read More
Culture

New England Journal of Medicine Pushes Reparations

Reparations would grant African Americans government benefits not paid to other Americans to rectify the awful sin of slavery and the "peculiar institution's" residual harm. It is a favored policy of hard progressives, so of course, the New England Journal of Medicine -- which regularly promotes left-wing causes ... Read More
Books

Three Cheers for the Quiet Ones

People often dismiss shy, quiet characters in literature. Readers prefer to identify with Jo March, Elizabeth Bennett, or Anne Shirley -- those delightful, bold, and charming characters who made a deep impression on us when we first encountered them. While there’s nothing wrong with emulating or admiring these ... Read More
Books

Three Cheers for the Quiet Ones

People often dismiss shy, quiet characters in literature. Readers prefer to identify with Jo March, Elizabeth Bennett, or Anne Shirley -- those delightful, bold, and charming characters who made a deep impression on us when we first encountered them. While there’s nothing wrong with emulating or admiring these ... Read More