The Corner

Politics & Policy

Once More, the Question of Veracity

Impromptus today starts with Che Guevara and ends with Richard Pipes: someone who devoted his life to Communism and tyranny, and someone who devoted his to opposing those things. In between, I have President Trump, among other subjects.

Back in June, I wrote a post titled “A Separate Question: Veracity.” The gist was this: Many people say that Trump’s tweets are “inappropriate” and “unpresidential” and so on. But are they true? Doesn’t that matter, too? Whether the president tells the truth?

Was “low I.Q. Crazy Mika” “bleeding badly from a face-lift” or not? Did “Liddle’ Bob Corker” decline to run for reelection when Trump refused to endorse him or not? According to Corker, Trump assured him repeatedly that he would endorse him for reelection.

Someone’s lying here. Is it the president or the senator? Does it matter? I think it does, and this is a fault line: There are many, many people who simply don’t care.

To be continued, for sure …

P.S. In Impromptus, I also mention the Nobel prizes — which may be headed for a fall. Why? “Diversity.” For the last two years, there have been no women among the laureates. And this has occasioned comment and concern. So, the various committees will meet this winter “to discuss gender and ethnic diversity issues,” according to a report. (By the way, three of the six committees are currently chaired by women.)

This is bad news bears. If the prizes are suspected of taking sex, ethnicity, and race into account, they are degraded. And the honor of some winners is dimmed. Plus, the testator, Alfred Nobel, would be seriously ticked.

I know him a little — got to know him well, in fact, when I wrote my history of his prizes. He was a man of great liberality, universality, and humanity. His thinking was rigorous and his standards were high.

In his will (1895), he wrote the following, which may seem quaint today, but which is full of meaning: “It is my express wish that in awarding the prizes no consideration be given to the nationality of the candidates, but that the most worthy shall receive the prize, whether he be Scandinavian or not.”

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

It’s the Stock Market, Stupid

Before going any further, I must say that I don’t believe Protectionist Donald really will go all the way with his present attempt to strangle global trade. I believe that the end run will be quite similar to what it was with the steel and aluminum tariffs — which is to say, a photo op in the Oval Office. ... Read More

An Even Worse Vatican Deal with China

Of all the disturbing and even silly things that have been said in defense of the deal between the Vatican and China reportedly being negotiated, the most offensive is that critics of this proposed arrangement to regularize Catholic life in the PRC don’t understand that the Cold War is over and the world is in ... Read More

Ten Things that Caught My Eye Today (March 23, 2018)

I send out a free weekly e-mail newsletter that typically goes out Saturday mornings and includes WFB flashbacks, Firing Line videos, upcoming events, and some of what I’ve been up to. Sign up here. 1. Cardinal Timothy Dolan in the Wall Street Journal: Talking about New York, he noted: 2. The Guardian on the ... Read More
National Review

Palm Sunday with WFB

The wonderful National Review Institute forum in New York City last month, held on the tenth anniversary of Bill Buckley’s death -- but truly a celebration of his life and legacy -- was captured by the good folks at C-SPAN, who now tell us that two panels of the forum will be broadcast this Sunday on C-SAN 3. ... Read More