A challenging comment left on the New York Post website after yesterday’s column about the Fast and Furious fiasco, which was also linked here at NRO, on Lucianne, Real Clear Politics, Instapundit and The Blaze, thus accounting for the huge traffic surge:
Why does this writer start off with leaving out that our government actually PAID for the weapons?
I’m still pondering that one. What else can I start off with by leaving out? And if I don’t leave it out, and therefore start off with it, would I be leaving out something else? If so, what?
Suggestions/solutions welcome.