The Corner

Law & the Courts

Take a Bow, Conservative Legal Beagles

Peter Baker has a very good article on the conservative legal community’s work to prevent any more David Souters on the Court. It’s worth reading.

Some quick thoughts, following up on my earlier post:

There is nothing nefarious about this whatsoever. As Baker notes, liberals have their own vetting process. It’s less formalized than the Right’s, but that’s probably because it can be. Maybe there were reverse Souters in the 19th or early 20th centuries — I’m not that much of a student of Supreme Court history — but in the modern era, I don’t think there have been any justices that were secret conservatives who revealed themselves once on the bench. There have been several who were ostensibly conservative who “grew” on the bench.

Presidential candidates campaign on appointing certain kinds of judges. Taking serious steps to ensure that they turn out as advertised is a wholly legitimate enterprise for conservative and liberal groups alike. No such effort can be perfect, not least because humans often change their minds, but also because there are other criteria to be considered beyond ideological commitment: temperament, judicial independence, scholarly rigor, professionalism, etc. These are good criteria, even if on occasion they lead judges to places we might not like.

Lastly, over the last few years, a lot of voices on the right have insisted that the conservative movement “never conserved anything” and was wholly ineffectual. But this was never true. When Ronald Reagan ran for president in 1976, he made fidelity to the Constitution a centerpiece of his campaign. Until then, the “living Constitution” was almost uncontested in politics. Six years later, the Federalist Society was founded and commenced a dedicated campaign — nurtured and supported by other groups, conservative think tanks, and this magazine — to educate and prepare a new generation of lawyers and judges dedicated to reclaiming the Constitution. It was scholarly, serious, and quite transparent. That process was a work in progress, and still is, but there’s no denying the enormous progress we’ve made. From free speech to the Second Amendment, the Right — and the country — has scored important victories, and we should recognize them and be grateful for the hard work that led to them.

Jonah Goldberg — Jonah Goldberg holds the Asness Chair in Applied Liberty at the American Enterprise Institute and is a senior editor of National Review. His new book, The Suicide of The West, is on sale now.

Most Popular


Democrats Are Dumping Moderates

The activist base of the Democratic party is lurching left fast enough that everyone should pay attention. Activists matter because their turnout in low-turnout primaries and caucuses almost propelled leftist Bernie Sanders to victory over Hillary Clinton in 2016. Last month, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez unseated New ... Read More

Questions for Al Franken

1)Al, as you were posting on social media a list of proposed questions for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, did it occur to you that your opinion on the matter is no more relevant than Harvey Weinstein’s? 2) Al, is it appropriate for a disgraced former U.S. senator to use the Twitter cognomen “U.S. ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Strzok by a Farce

An investigation is one of two things: a search for the truth, or a farce. The House is conducting a farce. That fact was on full display during ten hours of testimony by Peter Strzok, the logorrheic lawman who steered the FBI’s Clinton-emails and Trump–Russia probes. The principal question before the ... Read More
Film & TV

Stalin at the Movies

Toward the end of The Death of Stalin, two Communist Party bosses size up Joseph Stalin’s immediate successor, Georgy Malenkov. “Can we trust him?” one asks. “Can you ever really trust a weak man?” his comrade answers. Good question. Last week brought the news that the head of Shambhala ... Read More