The Corner

Has Britain Declared Independence?

It appears, at this writing, that the “Leave” vote will prevail, and Great Britain will vote to leave the European Union. I confess that I feel some trepidation at the result: it seems a leap into the unknown, and it doubtless will produce some economic uncertainties for the U.K. But then I recall how easily we are lulled into accepting a new normal as How It Has Always Been. Britain was an independent nation for a thousand years before the two-decade reign of the EUrocrats, and it seems likely that the world’s fifth-largest economy can survive as an independent country again. Churchill and Thatcher would be appalled at the idea that it is even in question whether the nation’s needs are such that it can’t afford to be independent anymore. As an American, there’s an overwhelming urge to tell our cousins across the Atlantic: Hey, declaring independence feels awfully good, doesn’t it? At the same time, one must sympathize with the plight of the Scots, whose vote to stay in the U.K. a year and a half ago in September 2014 was heavily influenced by wanting to remain in the EU.

The broader question, which is unanswerable tonight, is what happens next. Losing Britain is survivable for the EU, especially as it will have strong incentives to negotiate terms of trade not very different from those that accompany EU membership. But reactionary nationalism is enjoying a revival across Europe (as it is in some corners here — if Donald Trump were a referendum instead of a candidate, he might actually win), and the center may not hold. Which may not be the worst outcome for Britain, but history suggests it may not end well for the Continent.

Dan McLaughlin — Dan McLaughlin is an attorney practicing securities and commercial litigation in New York City, and a contributing columnist at National Review Online.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Demagoguery Is Not Leadership

The government of Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern in New Zealand has, with the support of the opposition, decided to enact fundamental changes in the nation’s firearms laws less than a week after the massacre at two Christchurch mosques. This is the opposite of leadership. It is also an example of why ... Read More
White House

The Media’s Disgrace

There will soon enough be an effort to memory-hole it, but the media coverage of the Russia investigation was abysmal and self-discrediting — obsessive and hysterical, often suggesting that the smoking gun was right around the corner, sometimes supporting its hoped-for result with erroneous, too-good-to-check ... Read More
Politics & Policy

What Was Trump So Annoyed About?

One of the stranger arguments that I heard throughout the Mueller saga -- and am hearing today, now that it's turned out to be a dud -- is that Donald Trump's irritation with the process was unreasonable and counterproductive. This tweet, from CNN's Chris Cilizza, is a nice illustration of the genre: Donald ... Read More
White House

Our Long National Hysteria 

Our long national hysteria may not be over, but at least it should — by rights — be diminished. Robert Mueller delivered his long-awaited report on Friday, and Attorney General William Barr just released his summary of the findings. They completely vindicate President Trump regarding the allegation that ... Read More