The Corner

The British Elections: The National Question(s)

Writing in Politico, Tunku Varadarajan on the SNP’s latest surge:

[The SNP’s] Sturgeon is the most disarmingly deadly separatist in the Western world. She picked Scotland up off the floor after a rueful referendum, and built a movement that is unstoppable, a mix of tribal cordite and ideological assertion, of class and nation and aspiration.

True enough, but this surge comes with two big catches, both highlighted by Theodore Dalrymple in a piece for City Journal.

The first can be seen in a more detailed analysis of what the SNP is about:

Their policies are highly statist or would be until harsh reality forced a change. All private companies would operate, in effect, by license from the government. Another problem for Scotland would be the lack of an effective opposition. The Nationalists would hold all the levers of political power, including powers of indoctrination; and even before the last referendum, according to my Scots friends and acquaintances, an atmosphere of mild intimidation prevailed, such that those who opposed independence felt it better not to voice their opposition too loudly, however deeply they felt.

And then there is the paradox that the SNP is very pro-EU. I understand the political calculation behind that. It is designed to reassure Scots that their leap to independence comes with some sort of safety net, but then, as Dalrymple points out, there is this:

 Curiously enough, the Nationalists are firmly in favor of the European Union, an entity dedicated to extinguishing national sovereignty in Europe, and the formation of a super state with few effective checks on the politico-administrative elite. (The European Union’s founders were quite explicit about this goal back in the forties and fifties.) It is difficult, then, not to conclude that the real aim of the Nationalists, whether or not they fully acknowledge it, is increased access of the Scottish political class to the European politico-administrative elite.

There’s a lot to that, I suspect.

Those in Scotland who want independence need to wake up: National Independence, EU membership, choose one.

And the English?


[T]he most plausible explanation for what seems to have been a last-gasp surge in [the Conservatives’] favor [is that this] was a “nationalist” election. The Scots have made that clear. The Welsh and Northern Irish have always been tribes apart. The Scots broke away this time — irrevocably, one has to believe — and the English, perhaps the most subliminally nationalist of the lot, have found this strangely liberating. Labour has paid a price, and has been punished for consorting with the SNP. When you compute Tory gains, and the astounding likelihood (as of this writing) that UKIP ranks third among the parties for votes polled in England, you have a picture of a defiant, nationalist England. The Scots will separate, but on England’s terms.

I don’t think that’s quite right. If Cameron can summon up the political will to create a fully federal UK (including an English parliament) then there is a chance that the union will survive. If not, then I think that Varadarajan is right: A split is on the way. The fear for the English is that Cameron will shy away from the federal option, and will instead attempt to buy Scotland off with ever more generous concessions at England’s expense, an attempt that will eventually fail, but will alienate millions of English voters before it does so. 

If Cameron will not go federal, it is best that the break-up of the union were, to use the words of that distinguished Scotsman, Macbeth, “done quickly”.

Over at the New York Times, Ross Douthat worries about the Scots, but he worries too about the prospect of Britain’s exit from the EU (most unlikely to happen, sadly) for reasons that don’t stand up to much analysis, as might be expected from a piece that describes those wanting to quit the EU as “little Englanders”, a stale mischaracterization kept alive by the Brussels lobby.


Abandoning Britain’s “this far, no further” approach to Europe and leaving the E.U. outright, meanwhile, would cede economic and political influence (to France, most likely) for uncertain gains.

Um, no. Even if the “this far, no further” approach were viable (not really, despite the ‘referendum-lock’) the idea that Britain should swap less influence in the EU for more influence within its own country strikes me as a very good trade. And if the result of Britain leaving the EU were to increase French influence in Brussels , presumably at the expense of Germany, that would be fine: The worse the shape the EU that Britain leaves behind, the better for Britain.

Internationally, Brexit would actually increase Britain’s clout, at least on the trade front, as it returned to international rule-making as an actor in its own right rather than through the EU (where it is just one out of twenty-eight).

Faster please. 

Most Popular


Kamala Harris Runs for Queen

I’m going to let you in on a secret about the 2020 presidential contest: Unless unforeseen circumstances lead to a true wave election, the legislative stakes will be extremely low. The odds are heavily stacked against Democrats’ retaking the Senate, and that means that even if a Democrat wins the White House, ... Read More
Energy & Environment

The Climate Trap for Democrats

The more the climate debate changes, the more it stays the same. Polls show that the public is worried about climate change, but that doesn’t mean that it is any more ready to bear any burden or pay any price to combat it. If President Donald Trump claws his way to victory again in Pennsylvania and the ... Read More
Politics & Policy

But Why Is Guatemala Hungry?

I really, really don’t want to be on the “Nicolas Kristof Wrote Something Dumb” beat, but, Jiminy Cricket! Kristof has taken a trip to Guatemala, with a young woman from Arizona State University in tow. “My annual win-a-trip journey,” he writes. Reporting from Guatemala, he discovers that many ... Read More

What We’ve Learned about Jussie Smollett

It’s been a few weeks since March 26, when all charges against Jussie Smollett were dropped and the actor declared that his version of events had been proven correct. How’s that going? Smollett’s celebrity defenders have gone quiet. His publicists and lawyers are dodging reporters. The @StandwithJussie ... Read More
Politics & Policy

On Painting Air Force One

And so it has come to this. Two oil tankers were just attacked in the Gulf of Oman, presumably by Iran. The United States and China are facing off in a confrontation that is about far more than trade. The southern border remains anarchic and uncontrolled. And Congress is asking: “Can I get the icon in ... Read More