The Corner

Calling All Acela Corridor Conservatives

In these states, Clinton will win anyway.

I don’t think anything I’ve ever written, on any subject, has been read by as many people as the Public Discourse essay I published in late July, explaining why I cannot vote for either Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton.  I haven’t turned a hairsbreadth from that determination, and none of the contrary responses to the essay has been persuasive to me for a moment.

I still have conservative friends diverging from my position in both directions.  Some are so fearful of Hillary that they are determined to vote for Trump even though they find him a repellent human being who is unqualified for any office, high or petty.  Others are so appalled by Trump that they’ve decided to vote for Hillary, even knowing full well that she is both deeply corrupt and an implacable enemy of the common good as they understand it.

But lately it occurs to me that these friends and I have one thing in common.  Nearly all of us live in states that Hillary Clinton is going to win no matter what we do.  Practically every one of us lives in the “Acela corridor” traversed by Amtrak’s commuter rail line from Washington to Boston.  This comprises the states of Maryland, Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island, and Massachusetts, plus Washington, D.C. itself.  You can even throw in Virginia for good measure, since lots of folks working in D.C. live in the Old Dominion, and many of them travel Amtrak’s northeast corridor.

From Virginia to Massachusetts, these nine states plus D.C. deliver 114 electoral votes to the presidential tally.  Eighty-one of those votes are rock-solid for Hillary—subtracting Pennsylvania and Virginia, her weakest states.  My own sense of these things is that she will win there as well.  (RCP’s polling average has her up 4.4 in Pennsylvania, calling it a toss-up at present, and up 7.2 in Virginia, which is said to “lean” her way.) 

My counsel to conservatives in the “reluctantly for Hillary to stop Trump” camp, if they live in these states, is that she doesn’t need your help.  To those in the “reluctantly for Trump to stop Hillary” camp: your help is useless to him.  At least if you live in D.C., Maryland, Delaware, New Jersey, New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island, or Massachusetts, this is a plain fact: Clinton will win there no matter what you do, my conservative friends.  Would your votes put him over the top even in Pennsylvania or Virginia?  Not without a lot more moving with you from the ranks of the undecided.

So why put yourself through the agonies of an afflicted conscience, feeling responsible for a Clinton presidency we know will be horrifying?  As for The Donald, his chances look grim nationally, so why go down in ignominious defeat with him, having treated him as the standard-bearer for a party you once respected and called your own?  And even if he ekes out a victory, it won’t come from Acela Corridor states.  So vote for Evan McMullin if you can.  Write in Dolly Parton!  But don’t give either of these malodorous candidates the honor of your vote.

Free yourselves, my friends.  Answer the call of conscience.  Your actions will be of no account anyway.  All you Acela Corridor Conservatives have to lose is your guilt.  It feels fine, I promise.

 

Matthew J. Franck is the Director of the William E. and Carol G. Simon Center on Religion and the Constitution at the Witherspoon Institute in Princeton, New Jersey.

Most Popular

Elections

The Democrats’ Disastrous CNN LGBT Town Hall

A few days after Donald Trump committed the worst foreign-policy blunder of his presidency by betraying America’s Kurdish allies in northern Syria, former vice president Joe Biden, the elder statesman and co-frontrunner in the Democratic presidential primary, was on a national stage talking to CNN’s primetime ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Fox News Anchor Shepard Smith Resigns

Fox News Channel's chief anchor, Shepard Smith, announced on air Friday that he would be resigning from his post after 23 years with the network. “This is my last newscast here,” said Smith. “Recently, I asked the company to allow me to leave Fox News. After requesting that I stay, they obliged.” He ... Read More
White House

What Is Impeachment For?

W hat is impeachment for? Seems like a simple question. Constitutionally speaking, it also appears to have a simple answer: to cite and remove from power a president guilty of wrongdoing. Aye, there’s the rub. What sort of wrongdoing warrants removal from power? I’d wager that the flames of ... Read More
Elections

Beto Proposes to Oppress Church with State

Beto O’Rourke’s presidential campaign is within the margin of error of non-existence, but in his failure he has found a purpose: expressing the Democratic id. His latest bid for left-wing love came at a CNN forum on gay rights, where he said that churches that oppose same-sex marriage should have to pay ... Read More
NR Webathon

Don’t Let Michael Mann Succeed

I  enjoyed the running joke of Jarndyce v. Jarndyce in the great Dickens novel Bleak House, back when I first read it. Little did I know that one day I and the magazine that I love would effectively be caught up in a version of that interminable case, courtesy of a litigious climate scientist with zero regard ... Read More