The Corner

A Case at Law

Here’s a question I got from reader Tim Baughman. It has me foxed. Would any of our legal brains care to offer an opinion?

There is a legal proposition which is true: Those who plead guilty because of (sufficiently) bad advice by their attorney are entitled to a trial.

Other cases say that from this proposition it logically follows that those who have a trial because of bad advice from their attorney are entitled to plead guilty (having their trial conviction set aside).

These cases say this proposition is simply the “converse” of the accepted proposition. I believe it is not the converse (and that the converse of categorical affirmatives is not generally true in any event), and that the truth of the first proposition says nothing, as a matter of logic, as to whether the second proposition is true.

What say you?

I think the appeal of the law, for intellectually-inclined people, is that legal logic is a special kind of logic, that doesn’t yield easily to syllogistic analysis. If the second thing above followed from the first, for instance (which I am sure it doesn’t), would it also follow that a defendant who goes to trial and is acquitted, and who then is discovered to have had outrageously bad legal advice, would be obliged to plead guilty at retrial? Surely nobody would think so – well, nobody except Eric Holder, perhaps.

Anyone who actually knows legal stuff be willing to pass an opinion?

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Kat Timpf Chased Out of Brooklyn Bar

Fox News personality and National Review contributor Kat Timpf was forced to leave a bar in Brooklyn over the weekend after a woman she had never met became enraged upon learning she worked in conservative media. Timpf, who has twice previously been harassed while socializing in New York City, first described ... Read More
Film & TV

The Dan Crenshaw Moment

Given the spirit of our times, things could have gone so differently. On November 3, when Saturday Night Live comic Pete Davidson mocked Texas Republican Dan Crenshaw’s eye patch, saying he looked like a “hit man in a porno movie” — then adding, “I know he lost his eye in war or whatever” — it was a ... Read More

A Case at Law

Here’s a question I got from reader Tim Baughman. It has me foxed. Would any of our legal brains care to offer an opinion? I think the appeal of the law, for intellectually-inclined people, is that legal logic is a special kind of logic, that doesn’t yield easily to syllogistic analysis. If the second thing ... Read More
Elections

Fire Brenda Snipes

Brenda Snipes, the supervisor of elections in Florida’s Broward County, does not deserve to be within a thousand miles of any election office anywhere in these United States. She should be fired at the earliest possible opportunity. Snipes has held her position since 2003, in which year her predecessor, ... Read More
World

How Immigration Changes Britain

Almost nothing is discussed as badly in America or Europe as the subject of immigration. And one reason is that it remains almost impossible to have any sensible or rational public discussion of its consequences. Or rather it is eminently possible to have a discussion about the upsides (“diversity,” talent, ... Read More
PC Culture

The Lonely Mob

Just before the election, an Andrew Gillum intern named Shelby Shoup was arrested and charged with battery after assaulting some college Republicans on the campus of Florida State University. It was rather less exciting than that sounds: She went on a rant about “Nazis” and “fascism” — Gillum’s ... Read More