The Corner

CDC Finally Sets Date for Release of Abortion Data

On Monday, the Centers for Disease Control finally set a release date for their annual report on abortion statistics. The 2007 Abortion Surveillance Report will be published in Mortality and Morbidity Weekly Report on February 25, 2011. A number of liberal bloggers, most notably MediaMatters, have been eager to take the pro-life movement to task for our alleged paranoia about the Obama administration’s interest in hiding abortion data.

However, the Monday announcement capped several days of backtracking and mistatements by the CDC — which caused legitimate concern among pro-lifers. The story started on Thursday when Erick Erickson of was puzzled as to why the annual Abortion Surveillance Report was not released in November as it had been in years past. After making some phone calls, he got ahold of Rhonda Smith from the CDC’s press office in Atlanta. She stated that the CDC “will not have stats available at any time in the near future” and there “are no plans for them to come out any time soon.”

After posted a story about this, the CDC quickly backtracked. They contacted and said that the Abortion Surveillance Report is “tentatively scheduled for release this month.” The claimed that the delay was because “the population data needed to develop rate/ratio statistics was not available.” However, even at this time, they did not provide a specific release date for the data. It was not until Monday that the CDC set a release date of February 25.

The whole episode was very puzzling. Every year since 2002, the CDC has always released its annual Abortion Surveillance Report during the last two weeks of November. That did not happen this year. Furthermore, their stated reason for the delay did not add up because the population data necessary to calculate abortion rates and ratios has already been collected by the U.S. Census Bureau. As such, the delay, the backtracking, and the fact that the CDC failed to provide a specific release date until today were all valid reasons for concern.

At any rate, the abortion statistics provided by the CDC will continue to be useful to the pro-life movement. They document the prevalence of abortion in the United States. They have provided evidence of the effectiveness of various types of pro-life legislation. Finally, these statistics offer good evidence of the incremental progress the pro-life movement has made over the years. The pro-life movement, as always, was wise to remain vigilant.

Michael J. New is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Alabama and a fellow at the Witherspoon Institute of Princeton, N.J.

Michael J. New is a visiting assistant professor of social research and political science at the Catholic University of America and an associate scholar at the Charlotte Lozier Institute in Washington, D.C.

Most Popular


Put Up or Shut Up on These Accusations, Hillary

Look, one 2016 candidate being prone to wild and baseless accusations is enough. Appearing on Obama campaign manager David Plouffe’s podcast, Hillary Clinton suggested that 2016 Green Party candidate Jill Stein was a “Russian asset,” that Republicans and Russians were promoting the Green Party, and ... Read More

Feminists Have Turned on Pornography

Since the sexual revolution of the 1960s, the feminist movement has sought to condemn traditional sexual ethics as repressive, misogynistic, and intolerant. As the 2010s come to a close, it might be fair to say that mainstream culture has reached the logical endpoint of this philosophy. Whereas older Americans ... Read More
White House

The Impeachment Defense That Doesn’t Work

If we’ve learned anything from the last couple of weeks, it’s that the “perfect phone call” defense of Trump and Ukraine doesn’t work. As Andy and I discussed on his podcast this week, the “perfect” defense allows the Democrats to score easy points by establishing that people in the administration ... Read More
PC Culture

Defiant Dave Chappelle

When Dave Chappelle’s Netflix special Sticks & Stones came out in August, the overwhelming response from critics was that it was offensive, unacceptable garbage. Inkoo Kang of Slate declared that Chappelle’s “jokes make you wince.” Garrett Martin, in the online magazine Paste, maintained that the ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Elizabeth Warren Is Not Honest

If you want to run for office, political consultants will hammer away at one point: Tell stories. People respond to stories. We’ve been a story-telling species since our fur-clad ancestors gathered around campfires. Don’t cite statistics. No one can remember statistics. Make it human. Make it relatable. ... Read More
National Review


Today is my last day at National Review. It's an incredibly bittersweet moment. While I've only worked full-time since May, 2015, I've contributed posts and pieces for over fifteen years. NR was the first national platform to publish my work, and now -- thousands of posts and more than a million words later -- I ... Read More