The Corner

A Century Later, Turkey Still Won’t Come to Terms with the Armenian Genocide

The Turks in 1915 destroyed the minority of Armenians in their midst, killing probably as many as a million and a half, and driving hundreds of thousands into exile. Such a nation-wide exhibition of human brutality takes its lasting place in the collective memory. Yet Turkish officials and spokesmen for the past hundred years have refused to accept responsibility for this great crime, much less apologize for it.

They contest the numbers of victims. A world war had opened, and bad things happen in war everywhere. Armenians, they like to say, were making common cause with the Russian enemy, and ethnic cleansing was therefore a security measure. Turks as Muslims were waging jihad, but Armenians as Christian infidels had brought it all on themselves. In “Minorities,” one of his most judicious essays, Elie Kedourie ascribes much of the blame to the handful of Armenians who had let nationalist ideology take possession of them, a malady or infection “eating up the fabric of settled society.” In his summary of their fate, “the Armenians were forced to be free.”

But that was then. Why have the Turks ever since tried to hide what they did? Why haven’t they tried to come to terms with it rather than fester in mendacity? They reject any application of the word “genocide” to their misdeeds. Turks like the Nobel Prize–winner Orhan Pamuk or the internationally known pianist Fazil Say are brought to court to face accusations of slandering the nation just because they dare speak of genocide. Shame is obviously one component, and profiteering from Armenian dispossession is also obviously another.

The Nazi genocide of Jews has some common characteristics, first and foremost the willing participation of hundreds of thousands of criminal perpetrators. Although neither Hitler nor the ruling Young Turks left signed orders for genocide, both leaderships created the moral breakdown whereby crime was service to the nation. The Germans showed that it is possible to restore civilization by means of confession and reparation. Unless and until Turkey goes down that same path, it will remain an untrustworthy and haunted nation, not the candidate for the European Union that it aspires to be.

David Pryce-Jones is a British author and commentator and a senior editor of National Review.

Most Popular

Immigration

Angela Rye Knows You’re Racist

The political philosopher Michael Oakeshott said that the “rationalist” is hopelessly lost in ideology, captivated by the world of self-contained coherence he has woven from strands of human experience. He concocts a narrative about narratives, a story about stories, and adheres to the “large outline which ... Read More
Immigration

What the Viral Border-Patrol Video Leaves Out

In an attempt to justify Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s absurd comparison of American detention facilities to Holocaust-era concentration camps, many figures within the media have shared a viral video clip of a legal hearing in which a Department of Justice attorney debates a panel of judges as to what constitutes ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Pro-Abortion Nonsense from John Irving

The novelist has put up a lot of easy targets in his New York Times op-ed. I am going to take aim at six of his points, starting with his strongest one. First: Irving asserts that abortion was legal in our country from Puritan times until the 1840s, at least before “quickening.” That’s an overstatement. ... Read More
Film & TV

Murder Mystery: An Old Comedy Genre Gets Polished Up

I  like Adam Sandler, and yet you may share the sense of trepidation I get when I see that another of his movies is out. He made some very funny manboy comedies (Billy Madison, Happy Gilmore, The Waterboy) followed by some not-so-funny manboy comedies, and when he went dark, in Reign over Me and Funny People, ... Read More