The Corner

The Chicago fil-A

On the heels of the DISCLOSE Act’s failing to pass Congress, pols in two big cities prove what Senator Mitch McConnell and others have been warning about: The disclosure of independent political speech isn’t about holding people accountable, it’s about holding people accountable.

The Sun-Times reports that, “The anti-gay views openly espoused by the president of a fast food chain specializing in chicken sandwiches have run afoul of Mayor Rahm Emanuel and a local alderman, who are determined to block Chick-fil-A from expanding in Chicago.”

One Chicago Alderman eager to join the fil-A fray was asked whether it is illegal to hold up a business’s growth prospects for political reasons.

“Absolutely not,” said former Ald. William Banks (36th), the longtime chairman of the City Council’s Zoning Committee who presided over a massive re-write of the city’s 1957 zoning ordinance.

“Any alderman can hold a development issue for virtually any purpose. But if he’s doing it for the wrong reasons — if he’s citing a gay rights issue — there’s nothing illegal about that.”

Boston Mayor Thomas Moreno, equally nonplussed by Chick fil-A president Dan Cathay’s moral and religious beliefs, was asked pretty much the same question. The Sun-Times reports that, “Moreno said he has an ace in his back pocket if he runs into legal trouble: traffic and congestion issues caused by the [Boston] store that have been the subject of behind-the-scenes negotiations for the last nine months.”

Economic boycotts and other tussles between citizens, most notably the boycotts tied to Proposition 8 in California, are fast becoming a sideshow to the real issue lurking in compelled disclosure: Forget citizen-on-citizen retaliation. Is government’s ability to stunt or destroy a citizen’s business the real meaning behind “holding speakers accountable?”

The regulatory power held by local pols and federal officials is too vast, and these days wielded too capriciously, for the Supreme Court to continue to approve schemes that compel the disclosure of independent political speech the Court held, just last month, poses no threat of corruption.

— Stephen M. Hoersting is an attorney at DB Capitol Strategies and the president of Right Solutions.

Most Popular

Film & TV

Netflix Debuts Its Obama Manifesto

This week’s widespread media blitz heralding Netflix’s broadcast of its first Obama-endorsed presentation, American Factory, was more than synchronicity. It felt as though U.S. publicists and journalists collectively exhaled their relief at finally regaining the bully pulpit. Reviews of American Factory, a ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Capital versus Tucker Carlson

Advertisers do not advertise on Tucker Carlson’s show to endorse the views of Tucker Carlson. They advertise on his show for the same reason they advertise elsewhere: a captive audience — in Tucker’s case, the second-largest one in cable news — might spare thirty seconds of attention that will, they hope, ... Read More
Natural Law

Are Your Sexual Preferences Transphobic?

Last year, a study exploring “transgender exclusion from the world of dating” was published in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. Of nearly 1,000 participants, the overwhelming majority, 87.5 percent, irrespective of their sexual preference, said they would not consider dating a trans person, ... Read More