The Corner

Politics & Policy

Neither Party Opposes CHIP

And Republicans just voted to fund it

What will become of the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP)? Bastions of the intellectual class — Jimmy Kimmel, Jon Favreau, the New York Times editorial board — charge the Republican party with forsaking it. CHIP gives block grants to states so they can provide children with health-insurance coverage, but is on the verge of running out of money. Depending on whom you ask, the GOP’s recent push for tax reform as CHIP funds are drying up shows either unconcern about or opposition to the program, which traditionally enjoys bipartisan support.

Funding for CHIP expired on September 30, the end of the fiscal year. However, about $3 billion was left over in redistribution funds, allowing states to continue running their programs. In December, Congress passed a “patch” that diverted funds from elsewhere in the HHS budget to states whose programs were about to run out of money, keeping them afloat for a bit longer.

But those measures can only sustain CHIP for so long. “If Congress fails to act on additional funding in the very near future, states will have difficulty operating their programs — and may have to close them,” former Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services administrator Kerry Weems tells me. Per a report from the Georgetown University Health Policy Institute, several states will run out of money for their programs by January 31, causing 1.9 million children to lose their health insurance. By the end of February, that number would rise to 2.9 million.

None of that will happen, though, if Congress appropriates more money for CHIP before January 31 — which the Republican-controlled House just voted to do. The House’s short-term continuing resolution, which funds the government through January 19, contains a provision spending $2.8 billion on CHIP. That is enough to fund every state’s program through the end of March. The House bill just passed, 231–188.

Amusingly, there was speculation that Senate Democrats would block the bill, which needs 60 votes to become law. The reason? The bill offsets the new CHIP spending with cuts to Obamacare’s “prevention fund.” In November, the House passed a bill to reauthorize CHIP for five years using the same offset. It couldn’t get past the upper chamber because of Democratic opposition. (That Republicans and Democrats disagree over how to fund CHIP does not mean either party opposes the program itself, something that should be obvious but appears to elude the Kimmel-Favreau-James Bennet wing of the intelligentsia.)

But Democrats might support the measure now that the stakes are higher. The House plans to adjourn after voting on a disaster-appropriations bill, leaving the Senate to pass the continuing resolution as-is or risk a shutdown. A Senate appropriations committee staffer tells me that the House bill is “a clean continuing resolution with no major riders to bring it down,” adding, “I don’t think you’ll see changes to what the House gives the Senate later tonight.” If that winds up being the case, then CHIP will be fully funded for the next three months thanks to a bipartisan effort. No children will lose their health insurance, and the more hysterical among our commentariat can take a deep breath.

Most Popular


Democrats Are Dumping Moderates

The activist base of the Democratic party is lurching left fast enough that everyone should pay attention. Activists matter because their turnout in low-turnout primaries and caucuses almost propelled leftist Bernie Sanders to victory over Hillary Clinton in 2016. Last month, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez unseated New ... Read More

Questions for Al Franken

1)Al, as you were posting on social media a list of proposed questions for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, did it occur to you that your opinion on the matter is no more relevant than Harvey Weinstein’s? 2) Al, is it appropriate for a disgraced former U.S. senator to use the Twitter cognomen “U.S. ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Strzok by a Farce

An investigation is one of two things: a search for the truth, or a farce. The House is conducting a farce. That fact was on full display during ten hours of testimony by Peter Strzok, the logorrheic lawman who steered the FBI’s Clinton-emails and Trump–Russia probes. The principal question before the ... Read More
Film & TV

Stalin at the Movies

Toward the end of The Death of Stalin, two Communist Party bosses size up Joseph Stalin’s immediate successor, Georgy Malenkov. “Can we trust him?” one asks. “Can you ever really trust a weak man?” his comrade answers. Good question. Last week brought the news that the head of Shambhala ... Read More