The Corner

Economy & Business

Will We Declare Victory and Go Home in the Trade War with China?

President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping shake hands after making joint statements at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China, November 9, 2017. (Damir Sagolj/Reuters)

There’s talk of a deal to get the Chinese to buy $200 billion more of our stuff. This sounds great, but it’s unlikely China will follow through and even if it wanted to, experts are skeptical it’s workable regardless.

The big news here is that we are perhaps willing to accept a deal far short of any structural changes in how the Chinese does business. It can’t help that the point man in the negotiations has been Steve Mnuchin, who knows nothing about China, trade, or national security and is apparently desperate to get any deal.

It sounds like he was the one who urged Trump to buckle on ZTE because the China were insisting on it as the condition for further discussions. This led to Trump’s jaw-dropping tweet about saving Chinese jobs, which — rightly — caused a furor on Capitol Hill (if there’s not a deal, the uproar will have something to do with it).

Derek Scissors of AEI had a post on why ZTE is exactly the sort of Chinese firm we should be cracking down on:

ZTE is a central government-controlled state-owned enterprise. These are the companies the Communist Party relies on to dictate the direction of the Chinese economy, and putting them at risk is the best way to pressure the Party. If you want to “beat China,” you don’t rescue ZTE, you target many more Chinese state firms.

You target them for using intellectual property stolen from Americans. You block their access to our market just like our access to the Chinese market is blocked by the subsidies state firms receive. You consider whether their assistance to North Korea, construction activity in the South China Sea, or other international behavior should be sanctioned.

Hurting giant state enterprises hurts the Communist Party. It’s a better tactic than tariffs and much better than rescuing ZTE. President Trump was right to confront predatory Chinese behavior, but then strangely reversed course on Sunday. It’s important he gets back on track.

Getting the Chinese to really change is a monumental undertaking; a fig-leaf deal, especially with so much else on the administration’s plate, is the path of least resistance. It looks like that’s where we are headed.

Rich Lowry — Rich Lowry is the editor of National Review. He can be reached via email: 

Most Popular


Stick a Fork in O’Rourke

If, as I wrote last week here, Joe Biden may save the Democratic party from a horrible debacle at the polls next year, Beto O’Rourke may be doing the whole process a good turn now. Biden, despite his efforts to masquerade as the vanguard of what is now called progressivism, is politically sane and, if ... Read More

Ivy-League Schools Wither

A  number of liberal bastions are daily being hammered — especially the elite university and Silicon Valley. A Yale and a Stanford, or Facebook and Google, assume — for the most part rightly — that each is so loudly progressive that the public, federal and state regulators, and politicians would of ... Read More

One More Profile of Beto, Because America Needs It

Somewhere in Texas, filed on the fly by a glossy-magazine correspondent, and totally not as a parody written by Jim Geraghty -- “It’s all about vision,” Beto O’Rourke tells me, standing tall upon the Texas prairie, or brush, or whatever this high hilltop area is supposed to be called. We’re watching the ... Read More