The Corner

World

China vs. the Australian Strategic Policy Institute

A woman walks outside a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) hospital decorated with a Chinese flag following the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak, in Beijing, China May 19, 2020. (Tingshu Wang/ Reuters)

This month, the Australian Strategic Policy Institute — a Canberra-based think tank focusing on defense issues — published groundbreaking reports on Chinese genomic surveillance, disinformation on Twitter, and united-front influence operations in Western democracies. Just in June, ASPI’s work has boosted public understanding of the mechanisms by which the Chinese Communist Party clings to power at home and seeks influence abroad.

Impactful as these studies may already seem, they’re actually far more important than you’d expect. Why? Well, the Chinese government is bringing its weight to bear on discrediting ASPI’s work — the research center has struck a nerve in Beijing.

Take this piece published by Xinhua News Agency yesterday. Citing a pro-Beijing former Australian foreign minister, the director of an institute with which that former foreign minister is associated, a Chinese foreign-ministry spokeswoman, and others, the state-owned media outlet paints the picture of a hopelessly pro-American puppet organization manipulated by the defense contractors that fund it.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying said earlier this month that with such strong ideological bias, the institute is actually spearheading anti-China forces and its academic credibility has been seriously questioned . . .

The institute has fabricated reports on policies in northwest China’s Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, which the Chinese government has repeatedly refuted.

“Refuted.”

This month was not the first time that Beijing has trained its fire on ASPI, which has previously published work on how foreign universities cooperate with the Chinese military and, as Hua mentioned, the Xinjiang concentration camps. The truth is that ASPI does receive funding from the U.S. Department of State and American defense contractors. But the critics usually exaggerate the degree to which this is the case. And crucially, they never provide compelling arguments to debunk ASPI’s research.

Relations between Beijing and Canberra have deteriorated for a few years, a trend accelerated by the coronavirus crisis. Following China’s bungled coverup of its initial failures to contain the virus, Australia has called for an independent inquiry into the origins of the coronavirus, backing the United States. More recently, the Australian government provoked the Wolf Warrior–ire of Zhao Lijian, a Chinese foreign ministry spokesman, when it lobbied against a U.N. Human Rights Council resolution that scrutinized the United States.

As Chinese officials have spoken out against Australia from the foreign-ministry podium, they have matched that rhetoric with action in recent weeks. The two countries are on the brink of a trade war, with China curbing Australian beef imports and imposing higher tariffs on barley. Last week, the Australian government all but accused China of launching a massive cyberattack against multiple sectors of society (ASPI’s executive director named China as the culprit). And this is to say nothing of the CCP’s reach into civil society and higher education.

ASPI is a lightning rod in Australia’s conversations about relations with China and a frequent target of those sympathetic to Beijing, or at least skeptical of the United States. But in a sign of the times, a Lowy Institute poll released yesterday found that trust in China’s ability to act responsibly fell by half among Australians since last year. It sits today at 23 percent.

The institute’s boosters would be correct to claim vindication. But Chinese officials and their apologists in Australia chalk this up to American money, a convenient way to smear solid research. But with these new tensions in Sino-Australian relations, including that trade spat, the country’s most important export might well originate, as Xinhua put it, in “a yellow three-storey building in the capital Canberra, so inconspicuous that one could easily miss it.”

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

What Next?

Imagine this: You have a friend who has never saved a penny for his retirement. You ask him about it when he is in his twenties, and he says, “No problem — I’m going to win the lottery.” Years go by. You ask him about it in his thirties, in his forties, in his fifties, etc., and get the same answer. At ... Read More
Politics & Policy

What Next?

Imagine this: You have a friend who has never saved a penny for his retirement. You ask him about it when he is in his twenties, and he says, “No problem — I’m going to win the lottery.” Years go by. You ask him about it in his thirties, in his forties, in his fifties, etc., and get the same answer. At ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The World’s Worst Idea

Almost a decade ago, I wrote a little book called The Politically Incorrect Guide to Socialism. When Regnery asked me to write the book, I was happy to do it but wondered whether a book on socialism, a brief conspectus of its grotesque failures, would be necessary or useful. I wondered why anybody would be ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The World’s Worst Idea

Almost a decade ago, I wrote a little book called The Politically Incorrect Guide to Socialism. When Regnery asked me to write the book, I was happy to do it but wondered whether a book on socialism, a brief conspectus of its grotesque failures, would be necessary or useful. I wondered why anybody would be ... Read More
Film & TV

Laughing at Beyoncé’s Absolute Monarchy

Back in the Nineties, when hip-hop zealots questioned the intelligence of Beyoncé songs like Destiny’s Child’s careerist anthem “Survivor” and the sex-as-junk-food hit “Bootylicious,” there was little regard for the female agency that she now channels into an intersectional act, trading on gender and ... Read More
Film & TV

Laughing at Beyoncé’s Absolute Monarchy

Back in the Nineties, when hip-hop zealots questioned the intelligence of Beyoncé songs like Destiny’s Child’s careerist anthem “Survivor” and the sex-as-junk-food hit “Bootylicious,” there was little regard for the female agency that she now channels into an intersectional act, trading on gender and ... Read More
Education

Tom Cotton Introduces Campus Free-Speech Bill

I am pleased to announce that today Senator Tom Cotton has introduced the “Campus Free Speech Restoration Act” (CAFSRA). Under CAFSRA, public colleges and universities that promulgate restrictive speech codes, so-called free-speech zones, and other unconstitutional speech policies will lose their eligibility ... Read More
Education

Tom Cotton Introduces Campus Free-Speech Bill

I am pleased to announce that today Senator Tom Cotton has introduced the “Campus Free Speech Restoration Act” (CAFSRA). Under CAFSRA, public colleges and universities that promulgate restrictive speech codes, so-called free-speech zones, and other unconstitutional speech policies will lose their eligibility ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Government Misconduct Frees Cliven Bundy

Politically charged prosecutions — even ones that are thoroughly justified — often end badly for the justice system. So it appears with the federal prosecutions of Cliven Bundy and his sons. The government blew its case against Bundy's sons by overcharging them, resulting in a jury acquittal in 2016. Today, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Government Misconduct Frees Cliven Bundy

Politically charged prosecutions — even ones that are thoroughly justified — often end badly for the justice system. So it appears with the federal prosecutions of Cliven Bundy and his sons. The government blew its case against Bundy's sons by overcharging them, resulting in a jury acquittal in 2016. Today, ... Read More