The Corner

Politics & Policy

Chris Christie Revises His Record

In 1994, Chris Christie opposed taxpayer funding of Planned Parenthood but endorsed private funding of it — specifically, his own funding of it. “I support Planned Parenthood privately with my personal contribution and that should be the goal of any such agency, to find private donations.” Yesterday, though, he denied ever having given money to the organization.

In the same interview yesterday, with John Dickerson of CBS, Christie claimed that he had never “voiced support” for Sonia Sotomayor’s nomination to the Supreme Court. Here’s what he actually said in 2009:

While Judge Sotomayor would not have been my choice, President Obama has used his opportunity to fill a seat on the Supreme Court by choosing a nominee who has more than proven her capability, competence and ability.

I support her appointment to the Supreme Court and urge the Senate to keep politics out of the process and confirm her nomination.

The interview also touched on Christie’s record on “assault weapons.” In 1993, he said that support for a ban had moved him to make a primary run against a Republican state senator. Two months ago, Brett Baier of Fox News asked him about that statement. Christie first denied ever having made that statement and then, when Baier displayed a news clip including the quote, said he didn’t remember it. A few days ago, he conceded to Sean Hannity that he had changed his mind on the issue. The biggest factor in his shift, he told Hannity, was his experience as a prosecutor. Yesterday, Dickerson noted that Christie had said that he favored an assault-weapons ban even after he was a prosecutor. Christie responded that “what I said at the time was I was not interested in debating or changing, because I knew I couldn’t, New Jersey’s gun laws with a Democratic Legislature.” What he actually said in 2009 was a stronger endorsement of gun regulations than he said yesterday. His campaign at the time said, “Chris Christie supports the assault weapons ban and all current laws. He opposes attempts to permit conceal and carry laws in New Jersey, hardly the NRA position.” When Dickerson brought up the quote, Christie said that the change in his position on guns had taken place “over time.”

I find Christie’s answers to these questions puzzling. It is hard to believe that he has genuinely forgotten his record on these issues: A presidential candidate, you would think, has aides comb through his record, remind him of possible problems, and work with him on a strategy for handling them. On the other hand, it is also hard to believe that the strategy they came up with was: Let’s just hope nobody has access to Google.

(disclosure)

Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

Film & TV

Knives Out Takes On the Anti-Immigration Crowd

Since the beginning of the Obama era, the Left has broadcast two contradictory messages on the subjects of race and immigration. The first is that a so-called Coalition of the Ascendant will inevitably displace white Americans as the dominant force in the country’s politics and culture. The second is that ... Read More
Film & TV

Knives Out Takes On the Anti-Immigration Crowd

Since the beginning of the Obama era, the Left has broadcast two contradictory messages on the subjects of race and immigration. The first is that a so-called Coalition of the Ascendant will inevitably displace white Americans as the dominant force in the country’s politics and culture. The second is that ... Read More
From left: Harvard University's Noah Feldman, Stanford University's Pamela Karlan, University of North Carolina's Michael Gerhardt, and George Washington University's Jonathan Turley testify before the House Judiciary Committee hearing on the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, December 4, 2019.

The Impeachment Eye Test

To put it mildly, the 1960s were not notorious for juridical modesty. They might compare favorably, though, to Wednesday’s episode of “The Lawyer Left Does Impeachment” at the House Judiciary Committee. Oh, I have no doubt that the three progressive constitutional scholars spotlighted by Democrats yearn in ... Read More
From left: Harvard University's Noah Feldman, Stanford University's Pamela Karlan, University of North Carolina's Michael Gerhardt, and George Washington University's Jonathan Turley testify before the House Judiciary Committee hearing on the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, December 4, 2019.

The Impeachment Eye Test

To put it mildly, the 1960s were not notorious for juridical modesty. They might compare favorably, though, to Wednesday’s episode of “The Lawyer Left Does Impeachment” at the House Judiciary Committee. Oh, I have no doubt that the three progressive constitutional scholars spotlighted by Democrats yearn in ... Read More
Culture

The Absurd Crusade against the Salvation Army

We all know some individuals who are so obviously good and kind that we are certain if anyone were to dislike them, that's all we would need to know about the person. We would immediately assume he or she is a bad person. To hate the manifestly good is a sure sign of being bad. Such is the case regarding the ... Read More
Culture

The Absurd Crusade against the Salvation Army

We all know some individuals who are so obviously good and kind that we are certain if anyone were to dislike them, that's all we would need to know about the person. We would immediately assume he or she is a bad person. To hate the manifestly good is a sure sign of being bad. Such is the case regarding the ... Read More
White House

Nancy Pelosi’s Case

Further to the post below, a couple of thoughts on Nancy Pelosi’s statement yesterday. She said this near the beginning: During the constitutional convention, James Madison, the architect of the Constitution, warned that a president might betray his trust to foreign powers which might prove fatal to the ... Read More
White House

Nancy Pelosi’s Case

Further to the post below, a couple of thoughts on Nancy Pelosi’s statement yesterday. She said this near the beginning: During the constitutional convention, James Madison, the architect of the Constitution, warned that a president might betray his trust to foreign powers which might prove fatal to the ... Read More