The Corner

Law & the Courts

At the Most Important Confirmation Hearing in 25 Years, Republicans Blew It

Christine Blasey Ford was compelling and sympathetic. Clearly, she sincerely believes her account. But that doesn’t mean it’s correct. She very well could be mistaken about a long-ago memory, which is why Republicans needed to draw out the gaps in her story, walk through how others contradict her, and highlight the complete lack of corroborating evidence. The designated questioner, Rachel Mitchell, failed to do this effectively at all.

She acted like she was getting a deposition for a trial, when this was the trial. She didn’t focus in on the night in question, which matters most, and didn’t raise the inherent problems with memory and how Ford’s might have been influenced by her therapy. She wasn’t helped by the format and the interruptions every five minutes. But her question jumped around and she spent much too much time on meaningless process — she actually asked Ford, “Have you been told my questions in advance?” — and left fraught questions dangling, like how Leland Keyser contradicted her and her relationship with the man who introduced her to Kavanaugh.

It’s as if she didn’t have a plan, or it was a very poor one, and ultimately this is the fault of committee Republicans, who have made Kavanaugh’s task even more difficult this afternoon. Very disappointing.

Rich Lowry is the editor of National Review. He can be reached via email: comments.lowry@nationalreview.com. 

Most Popular

Elections

The Democrats Made Two Joe Biden Miscalculations

I think it's safe to say that there are many, many progressive Democrats who are more than a little surprised -- and a lot chagrined -- at Joe Biden's polling dominance. Look at FiveThirtyEight's polling roundup. Aside from a few high and low outliers, he leads the race by a solid 20 points (at least). Even ... Read More
U.S.

Our Modern Satyricon

Sometime around a.d. 60, in the age of Emperor Nero, a Roman court insider named Gaius Petronius wrote a satirical Latin novel, The Satyricon, about moral corruption in Imperial Rome. The novel’s general landscape was Rome’s transition from an agrarian republic to a globalized multicultural ... Read More