The Corner

Clearing the Record

The Party of Andrew released a sharply partisan attack today, insuating that John Derbyshire is  a Nazi.  This reader’s email copied to me explains how Sullivan Dowdified the argument here:

Mr. Sullivan,

As it happens, I strongly disagree with Derbyshire on almost every point imaginable.  Indeed, I disagree with the position he’s staked out in the current Corner debate.  But it’s frankly disgusting how you’ve willfully misconstrued his position by taking Goldberg’s quote entirely out of context.

Podhoretz and Derbyshire were engaged in a vigorous debate over whether it makes sense for America to preserve its ethnic composition.  One of Derbyshire’s tangential positions was that racial hatred is motivated not out of a sense of racial superiority, but out of a sense of racial inferiority.  Derbyshire wrote: “And immigration-related hostility to certain populations on the part of past generations of Americans was inspired not by the belief that they were inferior, but more often by the belief that they were superior.”  (http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=Y2NhZDYzZmY2M2ZjMmM2ODVlZTVmYWEwZjE0YzU2OGI= )  To which, Podhoretz responded, “The Know-Nothings didn’t think Catholics were superior. To put it mildly. Nor did the Populists of the 1890s hurl imprecations at Jews because they considered Jews superior. Sorry, Derb.”  (http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZDBlN2RjY2M0NDQxZGIwMTdhNjY4ZGUwNTU0ZTBkMWI= )  Derbyshire continued to try to defend the position, writing: “I can’t speak to 19C America, but among the Protestant Englishmen I grew up among, ‘Jesuitical’ was a synonym for ‘very smart.’  . . .  Whether there were people who believed Jews intellectually inferior to Gentiles I do not know; but I do know I have never, in a longish and well-traveled life, ever met such a person.” (http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NmQyMWU4ODRiMjdmYzVmMTUzMDMzYzIzY2FlMWJkODM=)  At that point, Goldberg entered the fray and wrote, “Derb, I really think you’re wrong about the racial superiority thing. I am in fact as we speak rewriting my chapter which deals with much of this, and I’ve found very little of that sort of thing. I think the Japanese may be an exception. But — to take just one example — E.A. Ross, by far the premiere ‘raceologist’ of the day, and an advisor to TR on immigration issues, was not prone to making arguments about the racial superiority of immigrants. He argued — as did many Progressives — that the darker and furrier races trying to come here were inferior to ‘real’ Americans.” (http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NWU3MzhhYjlkOGNhODVkN2I2NjJlM2JhNzQ3MjI4NGI=)

It is entirely and plainly obvious what the debate was about, and it was decidedly not about whether non-Hispanic whites are racially superior to Hispanic whites (let alone a Nazi position that would justify the “Herr Derbyshire” smear).  Either you decided to write about the debate and characterize its disputants without bothering to read what was actually written, which is a decidedly shabby thing to do (and foolish, in light of the debate over you attacking Ponnuru’s book without reading it), or you knew what they were actually talking about and decided to do a smear job, which is even shabbier.

Equally shameful is your insinuation that most of the Corner agreed with Derbyshire’s position (either his real one or your constructed one) because there were “few dissents.”  As a factual matter, there were numerous dissenting posts.  Podhoretz, Goldberg, and Lopez all criticized his position, Podhoretz repeatedly and dramatically (calling it, among other things, “chilling” and “horrifying”).  Only Stuttaford and Ponnuru posted anything else after the debate started, and neither made any suggestion that he endorsed Derbyshire’s position.  Perhaps most preposterous of all is the suggestion that Derbyshire’s position is mainstream conservatism, a suggestion leveled even as Congress and the President distance themselves from any anti-immigrant position (and indeed from any tough-on-illegal-immigration legislation).  If Bush is the prophet of “Christianist” conservatism, shouldn’t he be marching with Derbyshire’s purported goose-step?

I recognize that their recent attacks on your critiques of “Christianism” and Ponnuru’s book must be upsetting, particularly as the debate has taken a personal turn (in both directions).  But this kind of intellectual dishonesty is not going to impress anyone who bothers to click through the links you provide or who followed the debate on the Corner as it unfolded.  Having read the entire debate, I am, as the tone of the email suggests, appalled.  I’ve read your page fairly religiously for about six years now, and, honestly, this may be the point I check out.  For caricatures of the right and strawman arguments, there are better sites out there, and that seems to be the dish of the day from Chef Andrew.

Most Popular

The Pollster Who Thinks Trump Is Ahead

The polling aggregator on the website RealClearPolitics shows the margin in polls led by Joe Biden in a blue font and the ones led by Donald Trump in red. For a while, the battleground states have tended to be uniformly blue, except for polls conducted by the Trafalgar Group. If you are a firm believer only in ... Read More

The Pollster Who Thinks Trump Is Ahead

The polling aggregator on the website RealClearPolitics shows the margin in polls led by Joe Biden in a blue font and the ones led by Donald Trump in red. For a while, the battleground states have tended to be uniformly blue, except for polls conducted by the Trafalgar Group. If you are a firm believer only in ... Read More
Media

Jeffrey Toobin and Our Public-Hate Ritual

Oh, Jeffrey Toobin — let him among us with a free hand cast the first stone. Toobin, a writer for The New Yorker and fixture on CNN, was participating in a role-playing exercise on a Zoom call with his magazine colleagues, wargaming election-night scenarios. Toobin was standing in for the courts when he ... Read More
Media

Jeffrey Toobin and Our Public-Hate Ritual

Oh, Jeffrey Toobin — let him among us with a free hand cast the first stone. Toobin, a writer for The New Yorker and fixture on CNN, was participating in a role-playing exercise on a Zoom call with his magazine colleagues, wargaming election-night scenarios. Toobin was standing in for the courts when he ... Read More
Media

The Biden Protection Racket

Joe Biden is the most cosseted presidential candidate in memory. He’s run a minimalist campaign that’s avoided the press as much as possible, while the press hasn’t been braying for more access and answers, but eager to avoid anything that could be discomfiting to the campaign. Never before have the ... Read More
Media

The Biden Protection Racket

Joe Biden is the most cosseted presidential candidate in memory. He’s run a minimalist campaign that’s avoided the press as much as possible, while the press hasn’t been braying for more access and answers, but eager to avoid anything that could be discomfiting to the campaign. Never before have the ... Read More

A Few Cracks in the Progressive Wall

The contemporary progressive agenda — of, say, an Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders, or Elizabeth Warren — has rarely appealed to 51 percent of the American electorate. Most polls show opposition to Court packing and the abolition of the Electoral College. Voters don’t seem to like ... Read More

A Few Cracks in the Progressive Wall

The contemporary progressive agenda — of, say, an Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders, or Elizabeth Warren — has rarely appealed to 51 percent of the American electorate. Most polls show opposition to Court packing and the abolition of the Electoral College. Voters don’t seem to like ... Read More
Elections

Biden Is Still Underperforming Hillary

On October 20, 2016: Hillary Clinton was up 6.8 in the RealClearPolitics average in Pennsylvania. Today, Biden is up 3.8. (that race only tightened to 2.1 in the last week of 2016.) Clinton was up twelve points in Michigan on that day. Biden is up 7.5 right now. Clinton was up 6.5 in Wisconsin. Biden is ... Read More
Elections

Biden Is Still Underperforming Hillary

On October 20, 2016: Hillary Clinton was up 6.8 in the RealClearPolitics average in Pennsylvania. Today, Biden is up 3.8. (that race only tightened to 2.1 in the last week of 2016.) Clinton was up twelve points in Michigan on that day. Biden is up 7.5 right now. Clinton was up 6.5 in Wisconsin. Biden is ... Read More