The Corner

Yes, But How Does Climate Change Make You Feel?

I wrote in the new issue of the magazine about the fear that Donald Trump’s election may have, in the words of Paul Krugman, “killed the planet” by reversing President Obama’s climate agenda. One obvious absurdity in such a claim is the assumption that an Obama agenda was making extraordinary progress that Trump’s policies will unwind. Commentators are already acknowledging that this is not true.

But keep your eye on the question of “so what.” Even if one could hold Trump accountable for whatever climate change occurs, how high is the cost likely to be? Because one prominent side of that debate (Trump included) has long refused to acknowledge any costs at all, the field has been left open for activists to assert that anyone who takes climate change seriously should believe it will be literally the end of the world. But the mainstream scientific and economic literature does not support such catastrophic claims, and people are starting to notice.

According to the highest-cost estimate used in the Obama administration’s own “Social Cost of Carbon” analysis, for instance, the entire cost of climate change through the year 2100 comes down to a slowing of annual economic growth by much less than one-tenth of one percentage point. The climate-change-afflicted world of the future would be vastly more prosperous than the world of today. Almost any policy issue can claim effects of a comparable magnitude. (For more detail, I’ve written a primer on “Climate Costs in Context” for the Manhattan Institute that reviews just how modest the mainstream cost estimates really are.)

In the past, scientists, activists, and politicians have all pledged obedience to the outputs of climate models. Facing model output that does not support their narrative, the response is a rejection of the models. Nature headlined a commentary by Nicholas Stern, lead author of the United Kingdom’s climate assessment, “Economics: Current Climate Models Are Grossly Misleading.” Vox headlined its “explanation” of the quandary by David Roberts, “Economists Agree: Economic Models Underestimate Climate Change.”

Thus, the search is underway for new models to better vindicate promises of climate catastrophe. Because models are still not producing costs high enough to justify the action he believes necessary, Stern writes: “The next [U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] report needs to be based on a much more robust body of economics literature, which we must create now. It could make a crucial difference.”

Roberts, amusingly, suggests the solution of incorporating surveys of “expert opinion” to inform “better, more representative modeling.” In other words, if substantive research in the field is not confirming people’s feelings about climate change, it is the research rather than the feelings that should change. And what better way to accomplish that goal than by simply using the feelings instead of analysis as the input?

Inevitably, a “robust” new literature will emerge, teeming with models reverse-engineered to confirm pre-existing premonitions of doom. When it does, spare a thought for the earlier models created in pursuit of useful knowledge, whose verdicts were not nearly so dismal.

Most Popular

White House

Democrats in Peril

I will just make a prediction and try to keep out of the swamp of Trump-obsession as the weeks unfold. The anti-Trump movement is now in inexorable decline; it is a little like the Nixon defense forces after the Saturday Night drama in October 1973, with the departure of the attorney general, his deputy, and ... Read More

Canada Is Attacked Again

Media coverage of yesterday’s monstrous van attack in Toronto, which as of this writing is responsible for ten deaths and more than a dozen other casualties, was punctuated by political press conferences of the sort that are now an inescapable part of the dark theater of public tragedies. At his first ... Read More

Trump and the North Korean Tipping Point

The world has been stunned by North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un’s announcement last week that he was suspending his country’s nuclear tests in preparation for the impending meeting with President Trump. Even critics have had to concede that Trump’s bellicose rhetoric since last summer regarding the North ... Read More
Politics & Policy

E Pluribus . . . Gridlock

A mantra we hear everywhere these days is that diversity is a good thing. And no doubt, it is. Diversity facilitates an exchange of ideas and opinions, and it promotes economic growth. Moreover, the alternative to diversity is to suppress the views and opinions of some subset of citizens, which is completely ... Read More
Economy & Business

Trade Misunderstandings

I was distracted by other policy topics last week but not enough not to notice Peter Navarro’s article in the Wall Street Journal, headlined “China’s Faux Comparative Advantage.” Considering Navarro’s position in the White House, it is unfortunate that it demonstrates some serious misunderstandings ... Read More