The Corner

Colbert

I think it’s fair to say that Stephen Colbert’s appearance before a House Judiciary subcommittee this morning went about as badly as it could have for the Democrats. (Video should be up on the C-SPAN site soon.)

Painfully awkward and pointless, it made the committee’s majority members look ridiculous. Colbert can be very funny, but his kind of sarcasm only works in some contexts, and a House committee hearing room does not appear to be one of them. John Conyers (chairman of the full Judiciary Committee) actually asked Colbert to leave and submit his testimony in writing before he began, but subcommittee chairwoman Zoe Lofgren (who had invited Colbert) stepped in and asked him to proceed and testify. Conyers had it right. It’s hard to see how Democrats can expect anyone to take them seriously when they treat a serious subject this way. What was Lofgren thinking?

Yuval Levin is the director of social, cultural, and constitutional studies at the American Enterprise Institute and the editor of National Affairs.

Most Popular

Art

The Metropolitan Museum of Art Defaces Its Façade

The facade of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, designed by Richard Morris Hunt in 1902, contains four large niches that might display sculpture but have traditionally been left empty. This was prudent good taste on the Met's part, since sculpture on buildings is a tricky business that few artists in our age of ... Read More
Elections

Story Time with David Brooks

His latest column imagines a future in which Elizabeth Warren wins the next presidential election. Warren won convincingly. The Democrats built a bigger majority in the House, and to general surprise, won a slim Senate majority of 52 to 48. After that election, the Republicans suffered a long, steady decline. ... Read More