The Corner

On Con Jobs and Fighting

Since I set off quite a brouhaha by using the phrase “con job” on Special Report last Friday night, I’d like to throw a few thoughts into the ring now that I’ve had all weekend to think about it (and argue about it on Twitter and in e-mail). First of all, friends (and a few foes) have convinced me I should have found a better term. Con job too strongly implies accusations of bad or even sinister motives. I don’t think that’s true of Lee and Cruz and I know it’s not of their supporters. So for that I apologize.

That said, and with all due respect to Ted Cruz, I find it strange that so many of his biggest supporters won’t even allow for the possibility that he may have political interests here that do not begin and end with defunding Obamacare and which may be skewing his judgment. Don’t get me wrong, I am sure that Ted Cruz wants to see Obamacare go (I am also sure that’s true of a great many of the people he’s unfairly labeled members of “the surrender caucus” simply because they question the soundness of his strategy). But Ted Cruz also wants to run for president some day — perhaps some day very soon. He wants to cultivate a national political profile and maybe a national database of donors who’ve signed the petition he plugs incessantly. Maybe those factors play into why he insists that everyone must rally to him and his leadership?

Now I’m no babe in the woods. There’s nothing inherently wrong with any of that. Indeed, to a certain extent it speaks very well of him. The GOP needs more risk-takers and political entrepreneurs willing to challenge Beltway norms. Whatever disagreements I have with Cruz and Rand Paul, I admire their political creativity and boldness. Cruz has been very successful at changing the debate and galvanizing many on the right (while alienating some others).

But here’s where I was coming from when I mistakenly called this a con. While there’s nothing wrong or even unusual with Cruz seizing an issue – a very worthy issue! — and using it as a vehicle for his political ambitions, doing so doesn’t make his legislative strategy any more compelling, particularly when it appears he didn’t really have one. The plan all along seems to have been “if we build a movement, the votes will come.” And if the votes don’t come, well we will have this very handy movement as a consolation prize. It’s easier to ask everybody to mount up for battle when you’ll end up a winner no matter what.

More to the point, the problem with the way Cruz and Lee have talked about their effort is that they made it sound like there was a way to translate the movement into actual legislative victories in the Senate. But on Wednesday, when the House actually delivered, Cruz conceded that Reid “has the votes” and seemed to punt things back to the House. And yet in July, Cruz said that Obamacare can be stopped without “a single Democratic vote” in the Senate. Mike Lee has said if Republicans “simply refuse to fund” Obamacare we can get rid of it. That “simply” leaves out a whole lot of complicated things.

One thing it leaves out: Even if Cruz and Lee could convince Harry Reid to change the rules and require a 60-vote threshold on stripping Obamacare (because Harry Reid is such a reasonable guy), the change would also require unanimous consent from all 100 senators. Who thinks that could happen? Anybody? 

Even if, somehow, Reid went along — maybe we put the head of his favorite horse in his bed? We’re supposed to believe that Chuck Schumer, Al Franken, and Barbara Boxer are all going to go along too? Why would they do that when they think a government shutdown would be good for the Democrats? Where’s the leverage? How many ponies do you want to decapitate?

The argument I hear most from people boils down to a bunch of epigrams about the importance of fighting. If conservatives don’t fight on Obamacare where will they fight? If you never fight you’ll never win. Etc. etc.  But conservatives have been fighting Obamacare for years. And while it’s true that if you never fight you’ll never win, it’s also true that charging into battle when defeat is all but assured is not all that advisable either. Picking your battles isn’t “surrender.” It’s wisdom. I want to get rid of Obamacare as much as anyone. But I believe the only way to do that at this point is to win back the Senate in 2014 and probably the White House in 2016. Even so, I would wholeheartedly support the Defund movement if I didn’t think a government shutdown would hurt those chances.

Now I know there are all sorts of elaborate and heartfelt theories about why such skepticism is wrong. Fine. But why such skepticism should elicit cries of cowardice, RINOism (I agree entirely with Andy about the stupidity of that term) and betrayal is beyond me. Disagreements over tactics shouldn’t amount to heresy. We’re not Bolsheviks.

 

  

Most Popular

PC Culture

Hate-Crime Hoaxes Reflect America’s Sickness

On January 29, tabloid news site TMZ broke the shocking story that Jussie Smollett, a gay black entertainer and progressive activist, had been viciously attacked in Chicago. Two racist white men had fractured his rib, poured bleach on him, and tied a noose around his neck. As they were leaving, they shouted ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Strange Paradoxes of Our Age

Modern prophets often say one thing and do another. Worse, they often advocate in the abstract as a way of justifying their doing the opposite in the concrete. The result is that contemporary culture abounds with the inexplicable — mostly because modern progressivism makes all sorts of race, class, and ... Read More
World

Ilhan Omar’s Big Lie

In a viral exchange at a congressional hearing last week, the new congresswoman from Minnesota, Ilhan Omar, who is quickly establishing herself as the most reprehensible member of the House Democratic freshman class despite stiff competition, launched into Elliott Abrams. She accused the former Reagan official ... Read More
PC Culture

Fake Newspeople

This week, the story of the Jussie Smollett hoax gripped the national media. The story, for those who missed it, went something like this: The Empire actor, who is both black and gay, stated that on a freezing January night in Chicago, in the middle of the polar vortex, he went to a local Subway store to buy a ... Read More
U.S.

White Progressives Are Polarizing America

To understand how far left (and how quickly) the Democratic party has moved, let’s cycle back a very short 20 years. If 1998 Bill Clinton ran in the Democratic primary today, he’d be instantaneously labeled a far-right bigot. His support for the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the Defense of Marriage Act, ... Read More
Elections

One Last Grift for Bernie Sanders

Bernie Sanders, the antique Brooklyn socialist who represents Vermont in the Senate, is not quite ready to retire to his lakeside dacha and so once again is running for the presidential nomination of a party to which he does not belong with an agenda about which he cannot be quite entirely ... Read More
PC Culture

Merciless Sympathy

Jussie Smollett’s phony hate-crime story could have been taken apart in 24 hours, except for one thing: Nobody wanted to be the first to call bullsh**. Who will bell the cat? Not the police, and I don’t blame them. Smollett is a vocal critic of President Donald Trump who checks two protected-category ... Read More
U.S.

Questions for Those Who Believed Jussie Smollett

The “we reported the Jussie Smollett case responsibly” contention has been blasted to smithereens. Twitter accounts and headlines in the Washington Post, the New York Times, and the Los Angeles Times reported as fact Jussie Smollett’s wildly implausible allegations, and many other journalists did so as ... Read More