The Corner

Conrad: Deficit Deal Must Happen This Year

Sen. Kent Conrad (D., N.D.), chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, graduate of the Bowles-Simpson commission on deficit reduction and member of the “Gang of Six,” has been conspicuously absent from the recent budget debate recently (other than to announce his disdain for Paul Ryan’s plan).

However, Conrad did “surface” long enough to sit down with ABC’s Jon Karl in the bowels of the Senate for a “Subway Series” interview (video here). He said it was imperative that Congress agree on a meaningful deficit-reduction package this year.

“My hopes are for the country’s sake that we do [find a solution to] this because it’s critically important,” Conrad said. “[We] are on the precipice of very serious consequences if we don’t. And if it doesn’t happen this year, it’s certainly not going to happen next year. So it’s really got to happen now.”

However, when asked if the Gang of Six would eventually produce a plan, Conrad balked. “Can’t say for certain because we have a rule: Nothing’s decided until it is,” he said, though he added: “I wouldn’t have spent hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of hours of my time if I didn’t think there was a realistic prospect.”

Conrad said the Gang, which includes Sens. Dick Durbin (D., Ill.), Mark Warner (D., Va.), Saxby Chambliss (R., Ga.), Tom Coburn (R., Okla.), and Mike Crapo (R., Idaho), was hoping to put forward a plan that would reduce the national deficit by about $4 trillion over 10 years, the same goal outlined by the Bowles-Simpson commission. Paul Ryan’s plan would reduce the deficit by $4.4 trillion over the same period, while President Obama’s “plan,” aims to cut the deficit by $4 trillion over 12 years (only $2.5 trillion of that in the first 10).

Conrad told Karl he had never heard of a 12-year plan, and didn’t seem particularly impressed by it. “I really don’t know the motivation. One thing I’ve learned around here is I don’t know people’s motivations. I just try to pay attention to what they do. And 12 years, it’s an interesting concept,” he said. As to the so-called “Biden commission” that the president touted in his speech at George Washington University last week, Conrad said he was “unclear” about the goals and purpose of this new commission.

When Conrad announced his retirement earlier this year, he said that not have to run for reelection would give him greater flexibility when it comes to tackling the deficit. Now, with the 2012 campaign season getting into full swing, he maintains a grim optimism that a bipartisan deal is possible before it’s too late:

“I certainly hope this leads to a result because otherwise I’m going to have wasted five years of my life,” he said.

More here.

Andrew Stiles — Andrew Stiles is a political reporter for National Review Online. He previously worked at the Washington Free Beacon, and was an intern at The Hill newspaper. Stiles is a 2009 ...

Most Popular

White House

What Is Hillary Clinton Thinking?

When Homer Simpson looks in the mirror, he sees ripped chest muscles and arms like the trunks of beech trees. When Hillary Clinton looks in the mirror, she sees America’s sweetheart. She thinks: America adores me. She thinks: America already chose me to be president once! She thinks: Everyone is comparing me ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Grassley’s Kangaroo Court

So now it looks like next Thursday. On Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s manifestly meritorious nomination to the Supreme Court, what was supposed to be the vote out of the Senate Judiciary Committee this past Thursday now appears to be sliding into a hearing to be held next Thursday. Or, who knows, maybe a Thursday ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Censure Dianne Feinstein

Regardless of the fate of Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination, the Senate should censure the ranking Democratic member of the Judiciary Committee, Dianne Feinstein. Her deception and maneuvering, condemned across the political spectrum, seriously interfered with the Senate’s performance of its constitutional duty to ... Read More

Are We on the Verge of Civil War?

Americans keep dividing into two hostile camps. It seems the country is back to 1860 on the eve of the Civil War, rather than in 2018, during the greatest age of affluence, leisure, and freedom in the history of civilization. The ancient historian Thucydides called the civil discord that tore apart the ... Read More