The Corner

Contraception Conundrum

Over at the Washington Monthly, Steve Benen argues that progressives should use the passage of Obamacare to push for federally mandated coverage of contraceptives in health-insurance plans, which he says would be good politics and good policy. In particular, Benen argues that “family-planning programs are wildly popular, and contraceptives are commonly used.” Furthermore, the business community would support contraceptive coverage because some view it as cost effective.

Benen and other progressives should be careful what they wish for, they just might get it. While they might celebrate a liberal administration mandating that insurance plans cover contraceptives, abortifacients, and abortion, a conservative administration could easily prohibit coverage of these services.

More importantly, there is no guarantee that progressives would win a political fight over contraception. It is certainly true that most Americans support the use and availability of contraceptives, but the conscience rights of doctors and nurses enjoy broad public support. Furthermore, it is by no means clear that Americans want their tax dollars subsidizing abortifacients, and most Americans would certainly oppose any mandate that would invalidate the numerous state laws requiring that minors have parental permission before purchasing contraceptives.

Unfortunately, pro-lifers may not get the chance to fight this politically. Ultimately, the decision is in the hands of the federal Health Resources and Services Administration. Indeed, health-care reform removes a number of issues that the right-to-life movement cares about from the democratic process. For this and countless other reasons, the pro-life movement needs continue its efforts to repeal Obamacare

Michael J. New is an assistant professor at the University of Alabama and is a fellow at the Witherspoon Institute.

Michael J. New — Michael J. New is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Michigan–Dearborn and an associate scholar at the Charlotte Lozier Institute in Washington, D.C. He received a ...

Most Popular


For the First Time in Weeks, Relief Sweeps over Austin

Making the click-through worthwhile: The Austin bomber is done in by one of his own devices; some new numbers suggest that a small but significant portion of Trump voters are tiring of the chaos and aren’t showing up to support other Republicans in 2018; and the mixed news for conservatives coming out of the ... Read More

The Baleful Effect of #MeToo on Campus

Remember the series of hurricanes that pounded the Caribbean last summer? Something like that has been occurring on college campuses, as they're hit by one destructive mania after another: diversity, Title IX, anti-speech protests. Now it's the #MeToo Movement. In this Martin Center article, British academic ... Read More
Politics & Policy

March Mailbag

1. In response to this post, about the Fed and fiscal stimulus: “So are you saying that deficit spending is a free lunch because the Fed will keep inflation from happening? You say [extra government spending] won’t ‘raise economic output’ but what’s the harm of it if you’re right?” I see at least ... Read More


For your amusement, I hope, I’ve done a Jaywalking episode. It begins with a bit of the overture to Semiramide -- a Rossini opera I reviewed from the Met last week. Then I get into Russia and, after a while, China. The Marriott company fired an employee for “liking” a tweet by a Tibetan independence group. ... Read More