The Corner

Politics & Policy

Correcting the Record on the Electoral College

In a recent book, Princeton historian Sean Wilentz repeated the argument that the electoral college was intended by the framers to empower the slave states of the south, and therefore to protect slavery itself. It’s an argument with a long history, and one that has been revived of late by the growing progressive critique of the electoral college.

But this claim just isn’t supported by the evidence of the framers’ intent or of the consequences of their design. And in an extraordinary show of intellectual honesty, Wilentz himself says as much today in the New York Times. He writes:

I used to favor amending the Electoral College, in part because I believed the framers put it into the Constitution to protect slavery. I said as much in a book I published in September. But I’ve decided I was wrong. That’s why a merciful God invented second editions.

He then proceeds to lay out the evidence and to conclude it was neither the goal nor the effect of the electoral college to protect slavery or empower the slave-owning states. The case about intent is ultimately pretty clear, as he shows. And on the question of effect, Wilentz notes:

The early president most helped by the Constitution’s rejection of direct popular election was John Quincy Adams, later an antislavery hero, who won the White House in 1824-25 despite losing both the popular and electoral votes to Andrew Jackson. (The House decided that election.) As president, the slaveholder Jackson became one of American history’s most prominent critics of the Electoral College, which he blasted for disallowing the people “to express their own will.” The Electoral College system made no difference in deciding the presidency during the 36 years before the Civil War.

In fact, though Wilentz doesn’t get into this, in the years immediately preceding the war, the electoral college had the opposite effect. As the historian Allen Guelzo noted in a great National Affairs essay last year:

Ultimately, the Electoral College contributed to ending slavery, since Abraham Lincoln, having earned only 39.9% of the popular vote in 1860, nevertheless won a crushing victory in the Electoral College — leading many Southern slaveholders to stampede to secession in 1860 and 1861. They could run the numbers as well as anyone, and realized that the Electoral College would only produce more anti-slavery Northern presidents.

This doesn’t in itself add up to an argument in favor of the electoral college, and Wilentz doesn’t make such an argument (though Guelzo does, and a very strong one). But it’s important to correct the record, and it’s great to see an academic historian live up to the stated standards of his profession and own up to a mistaken analysis. I’m sure we all could stand to learn from his example of humility and rectitude.

Yuval Levin is the editor of National Affairs and a fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.

Most Popular

White House

For Democrats, the Party’s Over

If the Democrats are really tempted by impeachment, bring it on. Since the day after the 2016 election they have been threatening this, placing their chips on the Russian-collusion fantasy and then on the phantasmagoric charade of obstruction of justice. The attorney general accurately gave the ingredients of the ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Worst Cover-Up of All Time

President Donald Trump may be guilty of many things, but a cover-up in the Mueller probe isn’t one of them. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, attempting to appease forces in the Democratic party eager for impeachment, is accusing him of one, with all the familiar Watergate connotations. The charge is strange, ... Read More
PC Culture

TV Before PC

Affixing one’s glance to the rear-view mirror is usually as ill-advised as staring at one’s own reflection. Still, what a delight it was on Wednesday to see a fresh rendition of “Those Were the Days,” from All in the Family, a show I haven’t watched for nearly 40 years. This time it was Woody Harrelson ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Democrats’ Other Class War

There is a class war going on inside the Democratic party. Consider these two cris de couer: Writing in the New York Times under the headline “America’s Cities Are Unlivable — Blame Wealthy Liberals,” Farhad Manjoo argues that rich progressives have, through their political domination of cities such as ... Read More

The Deepfake of Nancy Pelosi

You’ve almost made it to a three-day weekend! Making the click-through worthwhile: A quick note about how National Review needs your help, concerns about “deepfakes” of Nancy Pelosi, one of the most cringe-inducing radio interviews of all time, some news about where to find me and the book in the near ... Read More