The Corner

Court of Appeals Blocks Obama’s Executive Amnesty

A three-judge panel for the federal Fifth Circuit Court blocked an appeal from the Obama administration today that sought to lift an injunction against the president’s plan to offer a form of legal status to millions of illegal immigrants. The panel decided 2–1 that “the government is unlikely to succeed on the merits of its appeal of the injunction,” meaning the original injunction, from Judge Andrew Hanen of Texas, remains in force and the program can’t go forward.

Twenty-six states filed suit against the move, arguing that it amounted to a new federal policy that hadn’t gone through the proper rule-making process (the Obama administration contends the new policy just amounts to enforcement priorities); Judge Hanen placed an injunction on the program before a decision about its legitimacy has been reached. There was some controversy over whether the Obama administration simply ignored the injunction — the Department of Homeland Security issued thousands of work permits to people who seemed eligible — but Hanen criticized them for it, and the Obama administration sheepishly claims it was all a bunch of clerical errors.

The litigation now could go on for much longer, it seems, reaching the Supreme Court.

Josh Blackman, a law professor and NR contributor, is writing up some analysis of the decision on his blog here.

Patrick Brennan — Patrick Brennan is a writer and policy analyst based in Washington, D.C. He was Director of Digital Content for Marco Rubio's presidential campaign, writing op-eds, policy content, and leading the ...

Most Popular

World

Trump’s Disgraceful Press Conference in Helsinki

On Monday, President Trump gave a deeply disgraceful press conference with Russian dictator Vladimir Putin. The presser began with Trump announcing that although the Russia–U.S. relationship has “never been worse than it is now,” all of that “changed as of about four hours ago.” It was downhill from ... Read More
White House

The President’s Do-Over

I agree with Jonah on all counts: On net, President Trump’s do-over of his Helsinki remarks is a good thing; regrettably, it is not sincere; and while I hope the revised version is the one he sticks to, I don’t have confidence that will be the case -- as posited in my column Tuesday on the folly of having the ... Read More