The Corner

Daniel Mitchell Responds

The Cato Institute’s Dan Mitchell raises several objections to my op-ed on Republicans and taxes.

He admits that child credits and similar narrowly-focused tax cuts will not boost growth, but he argues they will be politically effective. But since when is it the job of Republicans do adopt suboptimal (or even bad) policies for short-term political reasons?

Mitchell is assuming that a tax policy change is suboptimal if it doesn’t boost growth. I don’t see why that’s the case. I would favor getting rid of the tax penalty on individually owned health insurance even if it could be shown that it wouldn’t increase growth at all. Wouldn’t Mitchell? The tax code introduces all kinds of distortions that can usefully be combatted. Some of them reduce growth, and some of them don’t, or don’t much. I made a (brief) policy case for the change I advocate, not just a political one–and Mitchell doesn’t engage it. (That case is that our entitlements constitute an implicit tax on child-rearing that the credit is necessary to counteract.)

And does Ramesh–or anyone else–think the Republicans can out-bid Democrats in offering favors to different constituencies? And if adopting Democratic ideas is the key to Republican political success, how can he explain the political success of Ronald Reagan and the political failure of Bush 41 and Bush 43?

Again, Mitchell is assuming that an expanded tax credit for children counts as a “favor” to a “constituency.” He wouldn’t use that language (although liberals would) to describe, say, a capital-gains tax cut. Classifying the expanded credit as a favor assumes that the policy case for it is wrong–but, again, Mitchell has made no argument for that.

The child tax credit isn’t a “Democratic idea.” It was introduced into the code by the Gingrich revolutionaries, and was a central part of their Contract with America. But if Democrats want to expand it, too, that would be great in my book.

Ramesh Ponnuru — Ramesh Ponnuru is a senior editor for National Review, a columnist for Bloomberg View, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and a senior fellow at the National Review Institute.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

The Origins of Progressive Agony

What has transformed the Democratic party into an anguished progressive movement that incorporates the tactics of the street, embraces maenadism, reverts to Sixties carnival barking, and is radicalized by a new young socialist movement? Even party chairman Tom Perez concedes that there are “no moderate ... Read More

How Will the Senate Races Break?

How will the Senate races break? We have less public polling to go on than in recent years, so answering that question is harder than ever. But the news is more optimistic for Republicans than it was a month ago.   Waves and Breakers Four years ago, I projected in mid September that if “historical ... Read More
PC Culture

Warren Is a Fraud

Senator Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass.) has been telling a story for years. It’s a deeply romantic story about her parents and their young love, fraught with the familial bigotry of an earlier time. Here’s how she told it this week in a video she released in preparation for her 2020 run: My daddy always said he ... Read More

Two Minnesota Republican Candidates Assaulted

Two Republican candidates for state office in Minnesota have been physically assaulted in recent days, leading prominent Republican lawmakers to caution their Democratic colleagues against employing inflammatory rhetoric. Republican state representative Sarah Anderson was punched in the arm last week after ... Read More
Law & the Courts

A Christian Man Receives Justice

A good man’s legal ordeal is at an end. Yesterday, my friends and former colleagues at the Alliance Defending Freedom announced that former Atlanta fire chief Kelvin Cochran had reached a $1.2 million settlement, ending a case he brought after the city fired him for writing -- and distributing to a select few ... Read More