Peggy Noonan and Kathleen Parker take up the Christopher Buckley business today. In her Palin-centered column, Peggy says those “whose thoughts lead them to criticism in this area are to be shunned, and accused of the lowest motives,” and then cites Christopher’s resignation from his NR column as an example. Peggy is a busy person, so I suppose she hasn’t had time to notice that Kathleen Parker’s columns ripping Sarah Palin have appeared on NRO. That David Frum has aired his discontent with the Palin pick on NRO. That others of us–Ramesh and even me (between my occasional bouts of rhapsodic gushing!)–have criticized aspects of her performance. And that other writers on NRO have stuck up for Palin and pushed back against the critics. It’s called debate. Now, I regret how some conservatives immediately question the motives of the critics of Palin, but it’s equally regrettable that Noonan, Parker et al are portraying most conservatives as irrational thugs. It makes you wonder: Who is really being overly emotional and deeply unfair in this intra-mural conservative debate? Which brings us naturally to Kathleen Parker’s column today. Read and judge for yourself. Is this calm, cool deliberation? Or hyperbole worthy of a peeved e-mailer? (By the way, I hate that Kathleen got any abusive e-mails at all; it’s a very unfortunate part of the world of the web. But hate e-mail goes both ways. I wouldn’t want to live for a minute with, say, Kathryn Lopez’s or Jonah Goldberg’s in-box on any given day.) Finally, on Christopher, I already addressed it here. But he proffered a “sincere offer” of resignation of his column that he had taken up temporarily while Mark Steyn was on hiatus. It struck us as a win-win: Chris would get out of a column we thought he wanted out of; we’d get Mark Steyn, who had recently returned to writing, back on our back page. We never imagined Chris would feel he’d been “fatwa-ed.” In any case, Chris is still on NR’s board, and is welcome to write pieces for us going forward, which I’m hoping he’ll do after everyone, very much including the Noonans and Parkers of the world, takes a deep breath.
Recommended

Chauvin Defense Expert Destroyed on the Stand
The prosecution blew the witness’s testimony to bits.

CNN News Writer Denies the Biological Reality of Sex at Birth
To pretend that we as a society are incapable of knowing whether a child is a male or female at birth is lunacy.

Powerful Evidence That George Floyd Resisted Arrest
The Derek Chauvin case is more complicated than prosecutors would have it.

Why Not Fewer Voters?
The fact is that voters got us into this mess. Maybe the answer isn’t more voters.

Never Ask a Question You Don’t Need to Ask: Chauvin Lawyer Gets Clobbered by Witness’s Gripping Testimony
There’s rarely an upside in asking pointed questions to a young, nervous, highly sympathetic witness.

The Great California Exodus
A look at why droves are leaving the state.
The Latest

Big Tech, You're Running Out of Friends
In adopting the progressive social agenda, Big Tech has embraced a natural antagonist.

McCarthy Calls on Pelosi to Take Action against Waters for 'Inciting Violence'
Waters urged protesters to ‘stay in the street’ and ‘get more confrontational’ if Chauvin is acquitted.

Cornyn Suggests GOP Could Back $800 Billion Infrastructure Bill
‘There is a core infrastructure bill that we could pass…So let’s do it,’ Cornyn said.

George Floyd’s Death: How Should the Jury Decide the Charges against Derek Chauvin?
It all comes down to intent.

Pennsylvania Governor’s Abuse of Emergency Powers Must End
Keystone State citizens will have a chance to vote on ballot initiatives that would restrain Governor Wolf’s executive authority.

Clarence Thomas Is Right about Big Tech
Treating Big Tech companies as common carriers would not be a legal innovation, nor a threat to property rights, but could be a way to protect and secure the civil rights of Americans.