The Corner

Democracy Versus Liberalism

This is one of those thinking-out-loud posts.

Here’s an interesting question (to the extent I find it interesting): Could the Bush Administration have argued for liberalism instead of democracy in Iraq? As longtime readers know, I’m in the camp (some might call it the Zakaria school, though he was hardly the founder of it) which holds that liberalism is more important than democracy. Obviously, I mean liberalism in the classical or philosophical sense: rule of law, individual liberty, free markets, free expression, etc etc.  Lost on many people is the fact that these things don’t necessarily come with democracy. Indeed, democracy can often take these things away. It seems to me that most Iraqis crave a liberal order more than they crave machinery. I’m not saying they don’t want democracy — nor am I saying that all of them want it at all — but my guess is that the average Iraqi would rather feel safe to walk the street, safe to speak his mind, safe in his home and property, safe to form contracts and assured to get a fair shake in court than be able to vote for this or that politician. 

My answer to my own question: Bush could do no such thing. It has been baked into the cake since at least Woodrow Wilson — and re-baked by JFK –  that we have to champion “democracy” first and the rule of law second — if at all. The problem, it seems to me, is that we don’t even have the language to talk about the nobility or merits of classical liberalism independent of democracy because ever since the Progressive era it’s been taken as a given that enlightened rule is anything but classically liberal. For example, many on the left see no problem singing the praises of  leftwing regimes which put “equality” ahead of democracy. As Derb once put it,  “Wherever there is a jackboot stomping on a human face there will be a well-heeled Western liberal to explain that the face does, after all, enjoy free health care and 100 percent literacy.” But regimes which put liberty and the rule of law ahead of democracy and the like are always immediately derided as dictatorial “strong-man” regimes. I’m not saying that such criticism isn’t sometimes accurate. After all, democracy is good and tends to innoculate against tyranny and without democracy enlightened regimes often go bad.  But  I would still have preferred to live under Pinochet than Castro or Lee Kuan Yew instead of Hugo Chavez (or, heh, the Hapsburgs than the Soviets). 

More importantly, it does show how stacked the ideological deck is.  Ever since Progressives decided that classical liberalism is morally illegitimate and ever since John Dewey redefined democracy into a form of socialism, it has been impossible to talk about liberalism first, democracy second, in foreign policy. All in all, that’s a real shame. 

Most Popular


Angela Rye Knows You’re Racist

The political philosopher Michael Oakeshott said that the “rationalist” is hopelessly lost in ideology, captivated by the world of self-contained coherence he has woven from strands of human experience. He concocts a narrative about narratives, a story about stories, and adheres to the “large outline which ... Read More

What the Viral Border-Patrol Video Leaves Out

In an attempt to justify Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s absurd comparison of American detention facilities to Holocaust-era concentration camps, many figures within the media have shared a viral video clip of a legal hearing in which a Department of Justice attorney debates a panel of judges as to what constitutes ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Pro-Abortion Nonsense from John Irving

The novelist has put up a lot of easy targets in his New York Times op-ed. I am going to take aim at six of his points, starting with his strongest one. First: Irving asserts that abortion was legal in our country from Puritan times until the 1840s, at least before “quickening.” That’s an overstatement. ... Read More
Film & TV

Murder Mystery: An Old Comedy Genre Gets Polished Up

I  like Adam Sandler, and yet you may share the sense of trepidation I get when I see that another of his movies is out. He made some very funny manboy comedies (Billy Madison, Happy Gilmore, The Waterboy) followed by some not-so-funny manboy comedies, and when he went dark, in Reign over Me and Funny People, ... Read More